Showing posts with label psychosis of political correctness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychosis of political correctness. Show all posts

Saturday, December 8, 2018

Tit-for-Tat: And Angela is again called insane.


At it again...all for you.


by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World
You are here reading a reply I made to a woman on Facebook...

I know! You are already yawning, but do you see what I, your Citizen Journalist, am willing to do for you? I am willing to go into the enemy's camp and try to turn them from the forces of darkness that many of them believe to be the light of salvation, and in so doing read their thoughts, deduce their intent, and find out their evil plans. 

Anyway, this woman tried to say Trump's mere talking about the caravan was so that nobody would pay attention to other crimes committed by a few Americans during that same period of time.

You remember it? The one that conveniently came up through Central America and Mexico and attempted entry through illegal and violent means at exactly the time a big US election cycle was in play? Yes, you do remember it. 

Suffice it to say my logical reply simply unleashed a torrent of links to CNN, WaPo, PBS, and then one to Fox, each with headlines that seemed to support her argument. Her name was Diane Jonson and she finally asked the question: So you say Trump did all this talking about the caravan because of the media? My answer follows:

Diane Jonson, that's what I said. It is the media's fault. Now, let's just ask ourselves a few quick questions: Why was this caravan formed in the first place? Why was it formed when it was? Who funded it? Why is Mexico not happy with the caravan?

Why is it so bad to talk truth about the caravan's genesis, support, and intent? Why are so many (I don't know but you included maybe?) demonizing any who stand up against attacks on freedom?

Why did so many news outlets stage fake scenes, photograph them, and then report them as real news?

One hint: There is a huge push by what is being called the Deep State to deprive all citizens of freedom and they will use whatever distractions they can and tell whatever lies they will to get those citizens to support them...and most citizens don't even know it.

Why don't they know it? Because they do not understand the nature of evil. Why don't they understand the nature of evil? Because they are good at heart and cannot even conceptualize it.

Evil depends on good people being fooled.

Don't be a good people that gets fooled. What you are seeing is merely the light being shed upon a deeply insinuating push for power that started back in the 1960s.

So the question then comes up: Why are we seeing it now? Because Trump is not playing their evil games for unlimited power.

Trump is trying to limit the power of government to the benefit of citizens in this country. Why is there such a pushback against this limiting?

As a human, Trump has flaws. Who does not? We could do a tit-for-tat listing of flaws on all sides all day long, but it does not change the fact that freedom is under attack, not only here in the US, but around the world.

So, to get back to the caravan: If those people chose an illegal method to gain entry to your home and take your stuff, would you open the door and welcome them in?

I think not.

Instead, you would doing all in your power to protect your children, your home, and your community by dialing 911 and maybe, just maybe, taking a baseball bat to them when they come in.

So, say what you want. Believe what you want. But I guarantee, unless you're a pushover wimp (and somehow I don't think you are), you'll be standing up for what is yours...just like Trump is doing for the country.

I then hit ENTER to post my reply. 

Almost immediately came back the comment from our dear Diane, "Oh! I get it now. You are insane. Take care and enjoy Lala land."

Our dear Diane only knows tit-for-tat comments meant to burn, insult, and shut down reasoned discourse.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why we never let our guards down when freedom is on the table. Make no mistake: Freedom is on the table here in the US. It has been taken off the table around the world. Citizens in other countries look to the US as that last place freedom is valued.

Let the bullies have their little fun trading tits-for-tats. But, you?

Don't get sidetracked into trading insults. 
Don't call names. 
Be polite but be clear. 
Stick to facts and stand strong. 
Stare unflinchingly at Evil and its cousins Stupid and Gullible until they blink. 



SUPPORT YOUR CITIZEN JOURNALIST.
AND BUY A BOOK!

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Trump refuses child support for Martian Baby Mama!


At it again...all for you.

by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World
Business writer.  Songwriter.  Protecting creator's copyrights. 


FLOTSAM is back at it again. This time, it was the Associated Press when they led a story on Bush 41's funeral with this paragraph (bold italics added): 

"Wednesday's funeral service for former President George H.W. Bush served as a rare reunion of the remaining members of the presidents club, but the front-row banter among Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter and their spouses came to an uneasy end when President Donald Trump and wife Melania arrived."

Banter? Banter is being witty or teasing, acting playfully and teasingly, to delude or trick with jest, to ridicule, to coax into action by argument or haggling...Okay, you know what? The AP used the right word but why would they stop it when Trump got there since they were all "bantering" about him anyway?

Hang on. Duh! You're right. They didn't want Trump to hear because they knew "The Hammer" could put the beatdown on them. But that doesn't matter because Trump seemed genuinely moved by the proceedings.

But this is not about the funeral. This is about the Associated Press — THE AP, for God's sake — and them turning into a tabloid gossip rag. Next thing you know, we'll be seeing headlines reading "TRUMP REFUSES CHILD SUPPORT FOR MARTIAN BABY MAMA!" and "TRUMP PAYS OFF BABY MAMA OF MARTIAN LOVE CHILD!"

I'm not kidding. You mark my words. It will happen. But the AP? The AP is doing this? There was a time when I looked for stories by the AP because I knew these were closest to the truth of what was happening. Reporting, yes! Opining, not allowed!

Oh, the agony of one's respect being flushed down the toilet.

Still, I do have to chuckle just a bit. The funeral was all about George H. W. Bush, number 41 as he was often called, and yet every frickin' media outlet out there led their stories with Trump. Trump gets frozen by Michelle! Trump ignores Hillary. Trump is... Trump is not... Trump could... Trump could not...

And all Trump had to do was sit there and say nothing. It don't get no better than that.

This is a YUGE statement I'm getting ready to make here so pay attention.

#41 and #43 were both hated by the media. As was Reagan. And now Trump. So, after listening to the entire service on December 5, 2018, I have concluded it was a coded message to Trump that said, "Ignore or use the media and the politicians who hate the country. But in no instance back down. Stay the course. You're doing good."

I'm sure some folks wearing pussy hats and "I'm With Her" t-shirts will disagree. I don't care.

* FLOTSAM means For Liberal Opinion That is Serious and Actually Matters

SUPPORT YOUR CITIZEN JOURNALIST.
AND BUY A BOOK!

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

"Oh, I get it quite well." An answer to a bully...or a lost soul. You decide.





SUPPORT YOUR CITIZEN JOURNALIST.
AND BUY A BOOK!

MY ACTUAL REPLY HERE IN TEXT IN CASE THE PERSON DECIDES TO DELETE THE COMMENT FROM THEIR FEED:





Actually, Susan, I get it quite well. Women fought to be allowed into everything male including clubs. They pushed and pushed to "be equal", which concept of and by itself is a false narrative because there is no such thing as "equality" between men and women and to seek it is a fool's errand. You see, real women have always had the power they needed. Surely you've heard of the saying: The power behind the throne is the queen; or Behind every successful man is a woman kicking his butt and pointing the way.

Nevertheless, by force of law and by using politically correct punishment techniques — example: screaming when a man holds a door for them, claiming sexual abuse when it was nothing but flirting — shortsighted women have successfully succeeded in making wider and deeper the divide between the sexes. They've demonized all men, bar none.

Further, these women who use PC Punishments and force of law to seek their own agenda, have shown their utter hatred for women who disagree with them.

So, yes, Susan, I get it quite well and am tired of the bully tactics these type of women use to gain power. And make no mistake about it, real power is not what they are after. They are after the power of the dictator.

You think I jest? Dictators destroy when they hear opposing opinions. RadFems and the pro abortion crowd are haters focusing on all things negative.

Sunday, November 18, 2018

Loving greenery more than loving people.

by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World
Which is worse: To love trees and bushes so much that people die? Or to manage the trees and bushes and save human lives, homes, businesses, schools, etc.? This poem written in 1895 sums up the California fire situation wherein Governor Moonbeam is praised for saving leaves and letting people die while Donald Trump is being called bad names — yet again — for pointing out a sensible solution that is used by many others to great benefit.


The Fence or the Ambulance
JOHN N. HURTY, M.D.
'Twas a dangerous cliff, as they freely confessed,
Though to walk near its crest was so pleasant.
But over its terrible edge there had slipped
A duke and full many a peasant.
So the people said something would have to be done,
But their projects did not at all tally,
Some said, ' Put a fence 'round the edge of the cliff';
Some, 'An ambulance down in the valley.'


But the cry for the ambulance carried the day,
For it spread through the neighboring city;
A fence may be useful or not, it is true,
But each heart was brim full of pity
For those who slipped over that dangerous cliff;
And the dwellers in highway and valley
Gave pound or gave pence, not to put up a fence,
But an ambulance down in the valley.


For the cliff is all right if you're careful,' they said,
'And if folks even slip or are dropping,
It isn't the slipping that hurts them so much
As the shock down below when they're stopping.'
Then an old sage remarked, 'It's a marvel to me
That people give far more attention
To repairing results than to stopping the cause,
When they'd much better aim at prevention.


'Let us stop at its source all this mischief,' cried he,
' Come, neighbors and friends, let us rally,
If the cliff we will fence we might almost dispense
With the ambulance down in the valley.'


'Oh, he's a fanatic,' the others rejoined.

'Dispense with the ambulance? Never!
He'd dispense with all charities, too, if he could;
But no! We'll protect them forever;
Aren't we picking folks up just as fast as they fall?
And shall this man dictate to us? Shall he?
Why should people of sense stop to put up a fence
While their ambulance works in the valley?'

But a sensible few who were practical, too,
Will not bear with such nonsense much longer,
They believe that prevention is better than cure
And their party will soon be the stronger.
Encourage them, then, with your purse, voice and pen,
And (while other philanthropists dally)
They will scorn all pretense and put up a stout fence
On the cliff that hangs over the valley.


SUPPORT MY EFFORTS ON YOUR BEHALF.
VISIT Consolidated Author Page  AND BUY A BOOK!

Sunday, October 7, 2018

Free Speech sure is a bitch

As you can see from my curmedgeon
face (courtesy of Snapchat),
I am engaging in free speech that
should show quite clearly my
opinion of disruptors of
free speech.
by Angela K. Durden

In October of 2017, the University of Wisconsin took a bold stand. They decided that free speech was something that should be respected on their campus.

Anybody — including P-HWPCDLRSFC* — who messes with free speech can expect to feel the consequences. That's right. Twice engage in violence or other disruptive conduct that disallows free speech and you can plan on getting your little protesting butt suspended. Do it three times and, as they say in baseball, you're outta here!

Of course, that completely displeased state public school Superintendent Tony Evers who is a P-HWPCDLRSFC if I ever saw one. Seems he thinks such policies allowing everybody to have a voice by punishing those who use violence to keep everybody from having an opportunity to speak "will chill and suppress free speech on this campus and all campuses."

Of course Evers thinks that. He's a P-HWPCDLRSFC!

What's even more humorous — and made this curmudgeon chuckle let me tell you! — was that other P-HWPCDLRSFC weighed in with a beaut of a whine. Seems they want a policy that will clearly delineate what is considered disruptive. That's right, y'all. Spell. It. Out. 

Oh, you know they will want language in there that will define disruption solely from the P-HWPCDLRSFC POV. 

Maybe they want an official policy statement that goes something like this:


Anyone (especially Straight White Male suppressors and their colonist girlfriends who do yoga with the wrong attitude) who disagrees with, attempts to disagree with, even looks like they want to disagree with anybody that —

  • wears a pussy-hat
  • carry signs that say anything like the following: "What happened?", "Feel the Bern", and "F**K TRUMP!"
  • shows pro P-HWPCDLRSFC messaging anywhere on their skin via paint or magic marker or permanent ink delivered via the tattooing method
  • shows pro P-HWPCDLRSFC messaging anywhere on their body via clothing, including panties
  • is or could be LGBTQ et al
  • is Proudly Brown, African-American, or Native American
  • claims to be Proudly Brown, African-American, or Native American whether their skin color, manner of dress, or birth certificate says anything to the contrary
  • is a machinist (ex: married to a computer)
  • screams and jumps around like a snake bit them while being in a naked state
  • screams and jumps around like a snake bit them while being in a clothed state
  • swings a club, baseball bat, or other heavy object
  • throws a Molotov cocktail
  • acts together in peaceful harmony with others of the above descriptions to turn over vehicles
  • includes other actions or types of genders and persuasions that we, the P-HWPCDLRSFC, are free to and shall name at a later date when it suits our purposes and is expedient in getting rid of those who disagree with us
will be dismissed from the campus the very first time they speak against an innocent P-HWPCDLRSFC who only has the best interests at heart of those they want to see expelled and who, by their very actions, show they are a lover of free speech and do not want to see a chill on the campus that shuts down free speech. 

You think I jest?


I guarantee that's what it would look like. Look. Just like I know pornography when I see it and can tell the difference between it and art, I know free speech from free-speech disruption. I'm betting you do, too. 







* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies




Thursday, August 2, 2018

Knock-Knock-Knocking on Your Front Door: The Straw Schutzstaffel

At it again...all for you.

by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World
First they came for straws in a restaurant. What's next?
Breaking down doors and pointing guns at kids while straws are snatched from their mouths and they see their parents hauled off to the gulag?

Boys and girls, I am all for looking after the environment, but how one goes about it is usually the problem. Get gubment P-HWPCLDRSFCs* involved and see how that turns out. I shall say just five words that will tell you all you need to know:

Prohibition. The War On Drugs.


That's right. Starting in 1920, alcohol, or as we say here in the South: alkeeHAUL, became illegal to drink, produce, transport, or sell. Thirteen years and many deaths at the hands of the new gangs running the rum later, somebody called a halt to that silliness.

Then the nation and a whole heap of the rest of the world got distracted from alkeeHAUL what with fighting Fascism, Socialism, and Communism, and what not so that, come 1971, President Richard Nixon, who never broke a law in his life**, ended the Vietnam War and started another.

The War On Drugs is still going on here in 2018, 34 years longer than the ban on the demon drink. This silliness is still going on.

Even Donald "The Hammer" Trump, who is himself not a partaker of drugs and drink, is agreeing The War On Drugs is out of hand. After Kim Kardashian West gave him some information on one casualty of this war, "The Hammer" looked into it.

He then commuted the sentence of one Alice Marie Johnson who had one — count it: ONE!  — tiny non-violent drug offense and had been sentenced to life without possibility of parole. Now that it looks like this war is ending, though, P-HWPCLDRSFC, who claim they do not like war, have now started —

The War On Straws.




One can only assume the City Council of Santa Barbara, California, featuring Cathy, Jason, Randy, Oscar, Kristen, Eric, and Gregg (see complete names and mailing addresses below) have nothing better to do than start The War On Straws. You think I jest? Ha. Look at just some of the official language they have released. Please note: Like all sneaky grabbers of power do, they upped the ante. I excerpt pertinent parts:

This ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day following its adoption, but shall not become operative until 2:01 a.m. on January 1, 2019. 
9.165.030 Sale or Distribution of Plastic Beverage Straws Prohibited. A. It shall be unlawful for any food provider or beverage provider to use plastic beverage straws, or to provide, distribute, or sell plastic beverage straws to any person. B....Non-plastic alternative straws shall only be provided upon request. C....
Of course, the first to be in big trouble with the S-SS, or Straw Schutzstaffel, will be the servers. Everybody knows how hard it is to keep that ever-rotating group trained. Brave and brilliant business owners, already under a massive amount of government regulation and yet manage to somehow keep the lights on, employ others, and make a profit, will be the next targeted group.
9.165.040 Upon Request Provision of Plastic Cutlery or Stirrers. It shall be unlawful for any beverage provider or food provider to provide plastic cutlery or plastic stirrers...: (1) the beverage provider or food provider first asks that person whether they want to receive..., or (2) the customer affirmatively requests....
The KGB has to be laughing their asses off as they make fun of the undercover CIA operatives at their cocktail parties. But it gets worse. As P-HWPCLDRSFC care so much, their next provision for lawful use of plastic straws involves government-approved emergency response teams and...

Hold on to your hats...
C....3. The food provider or beverage provider provides, distributes, or sells a plastic beverage straw to a person for whom non-plastic alternatives are unsuitable due to a mental or physical condition that qualifies as a disability pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC § 12102).
Holy cow. Now the City Council of Santa Barbara wants servers to ask for proof that somebody qualifies as disabled before they can get a damn plastic straw?

All that proves is the P-HWPCLDRSFC are into dividing people into classes based on weaknesses instead of allowing everyone to go with their strengths.

What say you? 

Shall we send the City of Santa Barbara, Kal-I-Forn-Eye-Aye, a packet of straws for each member of the City Council. I did not see where it was against The War On Straws to receive straws as a gift, though I well imagine that redo of the ordinance language will follow shortly upon the Council members' receivership of the nations' gifts.

Should you decide to send straws, please address your packages to:

City Hall
Attn: Council Member recipient name here.
735 Anacapa Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101

Shall we say, one package each for the following? Mayor Cathy Murillo, and other Council members Jason Dominquez, Randy Rowse, Oscar Gutierrez, Kristen Sneddon, Eric Friedman, and Gregg Hart.




* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies
** You will have surmised major comedic irony in this statement, right?


SUPPORT YOUR CITIZEN JOURNALIST.
AND BUY A BOOK!

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Unconscious Bias Training: Yeah, Starbucks' schizoid approach to business is not working.

Angela the Anonymous.
by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World

First they came for Zookerbug
and I spoke up.
Did I get any thanks?
I did not.
Then they came for Starbux
and I spoke up.
Did I get any thanks?
I did not.
But when they come for me,
Zookerbug and Starbux will be silent.

Bad derivation of the famous poem, but what do you expect when writing about P-HWPCDLRSFC* companies who have served their Deep State masters until those turned on them?

Liberal Socialist Fascist Commie ideology has never inspired a great stringing together of words. Have you ever tried to read Mein Kampf or The Unabomber Manifesto: Industrial Society and Its Future? Self-focused, overly romantic, and narrow viewpoints were not only boring to read, but lead to great destruction for destruction's sake with never a thought as to how to actually build.

In other words, Adolf and Ted alike were so focused on what went wrong in their own lives, they assumed everybody else felt the same. But they must have known, deep down in their heart of hearts that maybe, just maybe, they were wrong. Otherwise, why would Adolf have to lie to his own people, throwing generations of them under the bus, by calling his blatantly Marxist ideology Social Democracy? Otherwise, why would Ted remain anonymous and kill and maim for almost 20 years as a domestic terrorist?

Starbucks has just done the same thing to their managers and employees — and their paying customers — with their Socialist Fascist Commie Unconscious Bias Training.

Here's how they've done it.


Starbucks managers are responsible for sales numbers in their stores. Corporate is not interested in maintaining sales. No, managers are required to build those numbers.

In order to build those numbers, certain controls must be in place. Cost controls such as employee hours, shrinkage, and facility maintenance are musts with little wiggle room.

For those controls to work, somebody must make hard decisions. Who works when and for how long. How to keep customers and employees from walking off with products displayed in the store. And making it easy for paying customers to have a place to sit.

Starbucks managers' feet are held to the fire if they miss any Corporate-mandated profit goals.

And now store managers have to worry about reading minds? And identifying cheapskate social justice warriors wanting to use their facilities for their Campaign HQ? And now being told that the company they work for has always been a racist company whose goal is to control public spaces?

Really? How insane can you get?

However, here is what is most ironic about all of this.


Just as Facebook and Zuckerberg found themselves attacked by the Deep State and many other Liberals including #CrunkNewsNetwork crowd, so has that self-righteous bastion of How To Be the Best Liberal Company Ever — Starbucks — found themselves in the crosshairs.

Neither understands that no matter how much they do for the cause, P-HWPCDLRSFC will never be happy with anything they do because it will never be enough. And because they so want to please the crowd and have the crowd love them, they end up pleasing no one and being unloved.

With their Unconscious Bias Training, Starbucks' knees buckled to the psychosis of political correctness, and in so doing, they painted targets on their stores, their employees, and their customers. 

Starbucks needs to decide what business it is in and then do that. This schizoid approach to business is not working.




* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies

Sunday, March 25, 2018

Now THAT is a summary I can get behind.

At it again...all for you. 
by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World

Yet another mass shooting brings P-HWPCDLRSFC* outrage against those evil guns that simply can't seem to keep it in their clips. Let me quickly reiterate their arguments for gun control:

First: Blah, blah, blah.
Second: Boo, hoo, hoo.
Third: The CHILDREN!
Fourth: None for thee!
Fifth: Only gubment can have.
Sixth: Blee, bleck, and blooyee.

There. Done. And aren't you simply amazed at my ability to succinctly summarize? Want to see another great summary?

Well then, let's get to what Angela, also known as The Most Brilliant Woman in the World (in case you missed it above), has to say about gun control. 




Now THAT is a summary I can get behind.

* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Words to take home. (See Trigger Warning.)

by Angela K. Durden

HEY YOU, P-HWPCDLRSFCS*. HERE'S YOUR TRIGGER WARNING: Please be advised the use of three letters — A, M, and N — are used in this article in a non-alphabetic yet consecutive fashion so that it spells a word that means male. If you do not want to read that three letter word again, you are hereby advised to stop reading here and go no further. You have been warned.




BEGINNING THE NON-PC COLUMN: 

On a recent Saturday, when I was on my way to the monthly Sisters in Crime Atlanta Chapter meeting, I found myself arriving so early I had time to do some shopping.

I was in need of another br--errrr...undergarment and knew that Target might have it. So I popped in to the chain's location near our meeting place.

Sure enough, I got what I came for and went to the self-checkout. There was a young man there whose task was to look after the customers in that area. Target should be pleased to have such a employee because he exemplified great customer service.

The young fellow was making the babies laugh with funny faces. Giving high-fives to the kids who could barely walk. To the boys he gave a "Du-u-u-ude" and a manly fist bump. The mothers were helped with moving their bags to the cart as they held onto their kids. Everybody smiled and the Targét goodwill fairly flowed like manna from the heavens on an early morning.

Came my turn at the register and I proceeded to check myself out with minimal drama. I'm pretty good at that routine. When I turned toward the door the young man stood directly in my path and had something to say to me. But first, he smiled with just a teensy bit of a gentlemanly art-approving eye. Then he winked very nicely indeed. He followed that up with, "Stay awesome."

Stay awesome. 


I was not expecting that and it took me by surprise. I'm afraid my reaction may have stymied the young fellow's next efforts at expanded customer service. That is to say, I stared at him, then nodded, then thought, then smiled a little bit, and walked out. Dissing him was not my intention. I'm often simply slow on the uptake because, you see, I live in my head.

And at that moment my head was on chapter budgets and coming projects, and unfinished chapters in my new books. I was feeling pleased I found the br---...ummm, I mean undergarment I liked. Plus, at the Beall's next door was a long, black, lacy, flowing thingy one wears over a blouse and pants that fit me perfectly and was my price, that is to say, on deep sale.

But by the time I got halfway across the parking lot I was grinning big. By the time I got to my car I was laughing out loud and people were cutting their eyes at the crazy lady. When I shut the door to my car, I said aloud, "Oh, boy. Those are words to take home!"

And I did. But first I took them to my meeting and shared them. Lots of people found it humorous.

Let me put this scenario into the current P-HWPCDLRSFC* context.


I will explain why the young man felt free to say something like that to me. He would not be able to express it himself, but he did feel it as his core. You see, he knew I would not bite his head off and call down the wrath of the Radical Feminazi and report him to management for inappropriate behavior.

The RadFem and RadFem Wannabe would have already had their smart phone filming him while making running commentary about his Unchecked White Male Privilege Not Having a Patriarchal Clue as he Raped Women With His Mind Which is Just As Powerful as His Real Male Member That He Would Have Used If Other People Had Not Been Around, boo-hoo-hoo-hoo.

That video would go viral because one of the MSM would see it, put it on their website and tweet it out as a hard news story. Day two: RadFems and other social justice warriors with nothing better to do, would be calling for yet another ban on Target and the head of the young man on a silver platter.

Day three: Target C-Suiters would have scrambled their crisis response team to fashion an apology to all the disenfranchised genders. Day four: The young man would be fired, at best. At worst, he would be reassigned to a non-public facing position and told rising through the ranks was never going to happen for him.

Still, I think he's like a lot of other young men these days.


They are rebelling against the silly women because they are tired of not being able to be men.

Did you continue to read, P-HWPCDLRSFCs? If yes, did you notice how many times I've used the letters M-A-N consecutively in this article? Let me count them for you. Ten. Deal with it, you whiny butts.


Hey, stay awesome, y'all.





* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies




Friday, March 2, 2018

MIT says AI discriminates.

by Angela K. Durden
Citizen Journalist. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. 

The opening sentence in the opening paragraph of the MIT Technology Review (Vol 120, No. 6) article entitled Another Way AI Programs Can Discriminate Against You, says, "All too often people make snap judgments based on how you speak. Some AI systems are also learning to be prejudiced against certain dialects."

Well, duh. [Hit the high hat, please.]

The article continues with this: "Anyone with a strong or unusual accent may know what it's like to have trouble being understood by Siri or Alexa."

[Cue the laugh track.]

I'm a Southern Woman — I mean that with all the pride the capitalizing of both words implies. But even I cannot understand most of the people in South Georgia when they talk. Their accent is so deep, and they rarely step outside their counties, their vernacular could rightly be called a completely separate dialect worthy of study by any self-respecting government-funded university.

But does anybody study them? They do not. Does the MIT article even mention those with a Southern accent? It does not. But it does mention the P-HWPCDLRSFC's* most-favored group: The African-American. The article got worse the further I read.

Researchers took 59.2 million tweets with a "high probability of containing African-American slang" and ran those through several natural-language processing tools. One popular tool identified those tweets as Danish...with a high level of confidence.

But did they ask if those 59.2 million tweets were generated by Chinese or Russian bots designed to mimic certain patterns and mess with the P-HWPCDLRSFCs' minds? On which authoritative work did they identify said slang? The one-page article did not say, but it would be a fair assumption that researchers did not ask that question, and probably googled an online urban dictionary to build their initial reference data set.

The article then proceeds to devolve into even more sad violin playing wrapped in dire warnings the condescending subtext of which is "We need to train AI to care for the Little Black Chillens so that we, of the more enlightened and erudite of accents that computers can understand, will be able to consider what the group members say in order to bring it into the conversation at the grown-ups' table."

Now that is discrimination.







*P-HWPCDLRSFC = Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie

Monday, February 19, 2018

So, have you heard of this thing called "Resistance Genealogy"?

by Angela K. Durden

The psychosis of the politically correct runs deep. We now have something called "Resistance Genealogy" (RG), a new version of public pressure the P-HWPCDLRSFC* has come up with. 

RG says that if you complain about chain migration — Gasp! Horrors! Woe is me! — your genealogy will be researched and your ancestors will be outed if they migrated to this country.

Basically that means that you, here in 2018, have no right to want to keep anybody out of the U.S. if any of your ancestors ever originated from any other country. That's right. You must agree that chain migration is wonderful and perfect and cannot be changed if your ancestors came from somewhere other than the United States.

Well, geez, doesn't it certainly seem that Jennifer Mendelsohn, who started this entire idiotic movement, is a damned Fascist? One could rightly come to that conclusion. Now, you would think that our little Jen, being Jewish, would certainly understand that forcing others to adhere to a party line is definitely a negative, or does she believe the Holocaust is a lie?

As you can see from her tweet here, Jen is forcing, blackmailing, others to agree with her by using force:

Ah, Jen, Jen, Jen! 


Were any of your ancestors Nazi collaborators? Should I do a big ol' search of your genealogical records to find out? If I find out they were, you want to be outed as related to that and if yes, do you want me to force you to change your freedom to spout your opinion? Well?

I'm sure you want me to, after all, your followers certainly want all folks (one would assume that should include you) to "own their immigrant ancestors--warts and all...", right?  Don't believe me that what is being asked of folks? From your own website:



* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies

Saturday, January 27, 2018

A Question for the Ages: Just who is Angela?

by Angela K. Durden
Citizen Journalist. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. 

Who is Angela?

At this asking you might be saying, "Uuuuhh...I don't really care who Angela is." To that Angela, that is I, says, "It makes no never mind to me whether you care or you don't."

See? Now you know something about who Angela is. Angela is tolerant. Angela is patient. Angela is not tied up in her ego even though she mentions herself often using first person pronouns of I and me and my and mine and the Royal Reference of We, or the second person pronoun of you and yours, or the third person pronouns of she and her and hers.

[Charles Krauthammer, hater of commas that he is, should love the above paragraph.]

However, let me tell you why it is in your best interest to care about who Angela is:

Because Angela — who is loaded with faults the likes of which she has not been able to yet name, that is, all ego aside, she admits it is quite possible she is perfect — is not a P-HWPCDLRSFC*.

What does that mean? It means that Angela really does believe in allowing grown-ups to choose how they want to live their life and wishes the laws of the land would reflect the same. For instance:

Do you want to smoke? Then smoke.
Do you want to boink? Then boink.
Do you want to drink? Then drink.

Laws that tell you that you cannot are stupid, and a waste of time and taxpayers' money.

However, if you want to blow smoke in her face, boink her against her will, or get sloppy drunk in her presence, be prepared to suffer the consequences.

P-HWPCDLRSFC, on the other hand, know what is best for Angela. This is evidenced by the fact that, outside of a hospital environment, when Angela has studiously chosen to say "No thank you" to those silly germ-killing antibacterial hand sanitizers when offered, the P-HWPCDLRSFC jump back in horror and say things that are equivalent to a preacher intoning "Get saved now or risk burning in hell forever."

Only it comes out like this: "Don't you care about spreading germs to other people? What kind of a person are you? Please, do not come near me again, you...you..you Science heretic you!"

See? P-HWPCDLRSFC have religion. Their bumper stickers prove it:











*Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie.

Saturday, January 13, 2018

RadFems are in a tizzy and a star is born.

by Angela K. Durden

I want to personally thank the P-HW** part of the P-HWPCDLRSFC* crowd for their most recent contribution to columns written by your Citizen Journalist. Without their diligent efforts of pitching fits...errr...I mean social engine-... — damn it! Let me get this straight. 

Without their diligent efforts sharing FLOTSAM***, I would not be able to become the enlightened and caring fema-...damn it! I mean...person they want me to be.

The reason your Citizen Journalist is being extremely careful in the use of her language on this rainy morning in Atlanta (Decatur), Georgia, is because she just read an article about how women are leaving their pink pussy hats behind in droves because they do not want to offend trans women, non-binary women, and the most important group of all: Colored Women.

WAIT! 
I got that last phrase wrong. Let me restate: Women of Color. 

Whew. Man oh man, I thought I was going to get in trouble.

[And by using the phrase "Man oh man" I do not mean to imply an actual man because we know they are all evil and only want to rape women and little children and own slaves and kick dogs and take all the good jobs and so forth — unless, of course, they happen to be non-binary or trans, then they are fine and approved by women everywhere. No, my use of the phrase "Man oh man" was more of a declarative outburst of surprised contrition. You know what? I'll change it. Let's start again.]

RESTART OF ARTICLE FROM OFFENDING PART BEGINS HERE:

WAIT!  Got that last phrase wrong. So sorry. The phrase "Colored Women" is obviously the DNA of two white granddaddies having their say in veins and brains. Profuse apology as no offense was intended. Commence restating: 

"...the most important group of all: Women of Color.

Whew. Wowzers, I thought I was going to get in trouble."

END OF RESTART. 
CONTINUING WITH ORIGINAL ARTICLE FROM THIS POINT:

What was my point? FLOTSAM can be extremely confusing. Give me a minute to get back on track...Okay. I'm back on track. Let's continue. 

There in the Detroit Free Press was a huge article featuring lots of pink pussy-hat wearing white women who have been unknowingly insulting their fellow sisters (and misters who want to be sisters) who do not have pink pussies, or as the article said in a most scientific term: vulvas.


The article took 1668 words and 44 paragraphs (see full article text stats, left) to shake their fingers at — you are going to love this — insensitive white women who have pink pussies...I mean vulvas...and who wore a pink pussy hat while not thinking of the differing colors of vulvas of their sisters and the other parts of misters who want to be sisters. 

There was no research included in the article about how the women knew the color of the vulva for a certainty.

Of course, your Citizen Journalist is all about the research. So, she went to the world famous Goo-Goo-Goo search engine and typed in "female vulvas", and clicked on images. 

Your Citizen Journalist is telling you now: You do not want to do this. It ain't pretty. Seems more than humans have female vulvas. Who knew? And the things that can go wrong with them...barf and shudder.

But of the thousands of images that Goo-Goo-Goo pulled in, it can definitively be stated that of the human vulvas shown, only two were not pink, and they were brownish so one assumes they belonged to Women of Color. So this tells me on of three things:

One: Those who upload pictures of vulvas are racist and/or non-binary/trans phobic; or

Two: Those who decide what will show up in a search are racist and/or non-binary/trans phobic; or

Three: There aren't a lot of non-pink vulvas out there and these white women pouring guilt trips onto other white women were right all along and their pussy hats should be pink.


P!nk, the artist.

You remember this lady, don't you? She's actually a pretty good singer and performer. Anyway, urban legend has it (or maybe I heard her say it in an interview) that she chose her artist name based on something her boyfriend at the time said when he was in prime viewing position. He said, "Hey! It's PINK!"

And a star was born. 



* P-HWPCDLRSFC is Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commies
** Pussy-Hat Wearers
***For Liberal Opinion That is Serious and Actually Matters

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Heads, they be exploding.

by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.


As you may already know, in 2018 I will be releasing a series of books whose covers will include this:



I will tell you that thus far, one P-HWPCDLRSFC* has already ignored the warning. You see, the first book is with the editor now. The editor, who is not a P-HWPCDLRSFC, and knowing his girlfriend is a P-HWPCDLRSFC, chose not to say anything to her about the book. But she saw him working on it and decided to ask to read it.

She got about fifteen pages into the book when — BOOM! — her head exploded and she got furious at me and my editor, her boyfriend. She said, "I can't believe you're..." — oh, you will like this — "...editing a book that picks on Liberals."

My editor proceeded to tell me about it. My first thought: He ain't getting none for awhile. My second thought was: She'll be gone toot-sweet because one thing I know about my editor, he won't become a P-HWPCDLRSFC just to get some.

As an astute reader, I know you are asking, "Yeah, but, didn't she know he wasn't a P-HWPCDLRSFC, like her?"

Answer: Yes, she did. But like all P-HWPCDLRSFCs, Girlfriend had only been focused on what Boyfriend could do for her. She ignored his non-Liberal ways because to do so was to her advantage, or she would sayd, "Oh, isn't that sweet?" when he would opine about current events in such a way as supported the Constitution and disagreed with her P-HWPCDLRSFC thought processes.
.

But at least I've avoided one lawsuit since she clearly ignored the opening page of the book which includes the full trigger warning:

STOP! DO NOT READ THIS BOOK IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE PERPETUALLY OFFENDED GROUP KNOWN AS THE Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat RINO Liberal Socialist Fascist Commies, otherwise known via its acronym of P-HWPCDRLSFC. By reading this book of opinions, you hereby waive your rights to sue the publisher, the author and/or her children and/or estate, any and/or all book stores and/or street vendors and/or libraries who are selling or otherwise providing a copy of this book. If you read this book, whether or not you bought it, and if your feelings get hurt upon that reading, it will be clear you ignored the awesomely designed graphic containing a clear TRIGGER WARNING FOR THE PERPETUALLY OFFENDED included redundantly on the cover, and chose, AT YOUR OWN DISCRETION, to give up those rights and any and all recourse at law for getting a monetary settlement of any kind, including a refund for the purchase price as the publisher believes in the concept of 01100010 01110101 01111001 01100101 01110010 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110111 01100001 01110010 01100101. 

Stay tuned: Coming in 2018


*P-HWPCDLRSFC: Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie.

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Another "Squirrel!" Moment: The psychosis of political correctness

by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.


Again, the P-HWPCDLRSFC* crowd focuses on stuff that doesn't matter. Oh, what a waste of my time.







*P-HWPCDLRSFC: Pussy-hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

The Angst of the Cartoon Character

by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.



Do you remember Jessica Rabbit's famous line? "I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way."



That got me to thinking about all these other cartoon characters who have no say so in their destinies. They have no say so in anything about themselves. Their appearance. What words come out of their mouths. Nothing. They live and die by the will of whole committees of people. 

For the love of God, where are poor cartoon characters' Free Will and Right To Self-Determination? Oh, the angst they must go through as so well shown and sneaked by Jessica into the film "Who Killed Roger Rabbit?"

I bring this up because before too long — and you mark my words on this — marching in the streets for cartoon characters' rights will be disenfranchised, pussy-hat wearing females [DPHWFs] (it's always females that gets this crap started, isn't it?) and pussy whipped males [PWMs] (who mostly fail to get into DPHWF's panties and so are trying their damnedest to make Brownie points with DPHWFs).

You're saying, "Angela, now you've gone too far in your future telling. There ain't no way."

But I tell you, while DPHWFs and their PWMs don't mind marching for the right to kill unborn babies by the millions while forcing you and me to pay for it, they will steal [they say rescue] a puppy napping on a fleece bed from off a porch because they don't believe it is in a safe environment, and they will take copyright infringement cases to the courts on behalf a foreign monkeys.

"Oh, Angela. Nobody's ever taken a copyright infringement case to court on behalf of a monkey."

Oh. Yes. They. HAVE! Read this.

So, no, I tell you, I am not going too far in this matter of cartoon characters. Mark my words. When the DPHWFs and the PWMs run out of things to march for, and that day is here I tell ya, just remember that marches for the rights of the Cartoon Character is being plotted now.

You read it here first, folks.

You'll thank me later.

Sincerely,

Angela K. Durden
Your Citizen Journalist and Future-Teller

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Falling on a sword. Voluntary or not: Either way, you're dead.

by Angela K. Durden


P***y-chasing politicians and pundits and personalities on the P-HWPCDLRSFC* side are now being outed faster than you can refresh your Internet browser search window. Some say it's about time that sexual harassment was done away with once and for all.

With the longest drawl full of irony, I say, "Right." But there is actually more to this.


In long ago days of yore, falling on a sword was not metaphorical. It was an honorable thing to do for another. A thing voluntarily chosen. A thing involving a long, sharp, pointed object that tended to kill when poked inside one's body by one's self. 

Today, Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie (P-HWPCDLRSFC) men are being forced to fall on a sword whether they like it or not.

Matt Lauer and Garrison Keillor are the most current in this rush to judgment and need to "get it all out" so the P-HWPCDLRSFCs can get back to doing what they do best: Bashing anything not like them, and gutting the Constitution that protects and defends freedom on many levels.


As long as there are men and women, there will always be men asking to touch the goodies — and women saying hold yer horses there, big boy, sit up and beg for it.

And as long as there are women who are turned on by powerful men and who don't mind turning that process into a quid pro quo transaction, there will always be workplace hanky-panky. For goodness sake, isn't that what the celebrated TV series Mad Men and the badly written but highly popular 50 Shades of Grey all about?

Yes. They were.

And yes, real sexual harassment with real-life consequences of being fired, hurt, and killed are real. 


I was once fired when I said no to a manager where I worked. I immediately went to the owners of the grocery store business and complained. They chose to believe his ginned up evidence that I was a thief. There was nothing I could do except go out and get another job.

Once, while walking in the woods in a park when I was a girl of 12, a man who was definitely a predator attempted to make me his next victim. Long story how, but I got rid of him without backing down.

Not too long ago, a man forced me into my car making me have to fight him off.

And don't get me started on my step-father's real threats of violence and death to me and my mother and siblings if I didn't do as he asked, and you know what I mean by that.

So, I know real violence and real victims exist, and if anybody says I'm saying otherwise, they are a liar. However...

I believe there are many women out there who are confusing real predators who don't ask with eager hound dogs chasing the scent and begging pretty please.**


When I was a teen, two different bosses hit on me consistently. One responded to being ignored and gave up even as he almost cried saying, "But you've got such loooong legs."

The other I told, "My mother says you are a dirty-old man and to leave me alone." He laughed and every morning after that, he walked by, nodded, politely said good morning, and moved on.

When I was newly married, a huge customer of my (now ex) husband wanted to get in my panties. He was told no and he went away.

During parties and business functions, taking walks in the park, shopping for groceries, getting a hamburger at the drive-thru, going out dancing, and everywhere else you can imagine, I've been hit on by hound dogs.

No hard feelings from any of them. No threats to fire me or withhold business from the hubby.

Sad shakes of the head, sure. Winks and twinkles when they would next see me. Of course. But respectfully taking my no.

But why now all these P-HWPCDLRSFC men being outed all of a sudden? It's simple. 


The P-HWPCDLRSFC are trying to gain back control of a situation that has shed a harsh light into their dark places. Their brilliant idea is to force powerful P-HWPCDLRSFC men to fall on their swords and "take one for the team."

From this point forward they can say, "You know what, maybe we should have spoken up against Bills Clinton and Cosby et al, but damn it, it's not too late to prove we really do care for women. But more importantly, TRUMP SUCKS."

And notice the use of the phrase "inappropriate sexual behavior."


If that isn't a phrase totally designed to confuse and minimize, I don't know what is, especially among adults. What is inappropriate and harassing to one is awesome and welcome by another.

Even that phrase makes my point: P-HWPCDLRSFC cannot tell the difference and the reason they can't is because God and morals have been left out of the equation. "If it feels good, do it" became the mantra in the late 60s and anybody who didn't live by it was considered to be uptight or frigid.

Then came the laws against workplace sexual harassment and RadFems burning bras in public and then looking mean at the men who watched them.

You see how confusing it all is when there are no boundaries?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

* Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie.

** Gosh, just search on the phrase "sexual predator" and look at the images that come up. Talk about not understanding the meaning and turning it into high comedy.