Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Thursday, November 30, 2017
Oh, what my friends say about current events.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Falling on a sword. Voluntary or not: Either way, you're dead.
by Angela K. Durden
As long as there are men and women, there will always be men asking to touch the goodies — and women saying hold yer horses there, big boy, sit up and beg for it.
And as long as there are women who are turned on by powerful men and who don't mind turning that process into a quid pro quo transaction, there will always be workplace hanky-panky. For goodness sake, isn't that what the celebrated TV series Mad Men and the badly written but highly popular 50 Shades of Grey all about?
Yes. They were.
I was once fired when I said no to a manager where I worked. I immediately went to the owners of the grocery store business and complained. They chose to believe his ginned up evidence that I was a thief. There was nothing I could do except go out and get another job.
Once, while walking in the woods in a park when I was a girl of 12, a man who was definitely a predator attempted to make me his next victim. Long story how, but I got rid of him without backing down.
Not too long ago, a man forced me into my car making me have to fight him off.
And don't get me started on my step-father's real threats of violence and death to me and my mother and siblings if I didn't do as he asked, and you know what I mean by that.
So, I know real violence and real victims exist, and if anybody says I'm saying otherwise, they are a liar. However...
When I was a teen, two different bosses hit on me consistently. One responded to being ignored and gave up even as he almost cried saying, "But you've got such loooong legs."
The other I told, "My mother says you are a dirty-old man and to leave me alone." He laughed and every morning after that, he walked by, nodded, politely said good morning, and moved on.
When I was newly married, a huge customer of my (now ex) husband wanted to get in my panties. He was told no and he went away.
During parties and business functions, taking walks in the park, shopping for groceries, getting a hamburger at the drive-thru, going out dancing, and everywhere else you can imagine, I've been hit on by hound dogs.
No hard feelings from any of them. No threats to fire me or withhold business from the hubby.
Sad shakes of the head, sure. Winks and twinkles when they would next see me. Of course. But respectfully taking my no.
The P-HWPCDLRSFC are trying to gain back control of a situation that has shed a harsh light into their dark places. Their brilliant idea is to force powerful P-HWPCDLRSFC men to fall on their swords and "take one for the team."
From this point forward they can say, "You know what, maybe we should have spoken up against Bills Clinton and Cosby et al, but damn it, it's not too late to prove we really do care for women. But more importantly, TRUMP SUCKS."
If that isn't a phrase totally designed to confuse and minimize, I don't know what is, especially among adults. What is inappropriate and harassing to one is awesome and welcome by another.
Even that phrase makes my point: P-HWPCDLRSFC cannot tell the difference and the reason they can't is because God and morals have been left out of the equation. "If it feels good, do it" became the mantra in the late 60s and anybody who didn't live by it was considered to be uptight or frigid.
Then came the laws against workplace sexual harassment and RadFems burning bras in public and then looking mean at the men who watched them.
You see how confusing it all is when there are no boundaries?
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
P***y-chasing politicians and pundits and personalities on the P-HWPCDLRSFC* side are now being outed faster than you can refresh your Internet browser search window. Some say it's about time that sexual harassment was done away with once and for all.
With the longest drawl full of irony, I say, "Right." But there is actually more to this.
With the longest drawl full of irony, I say, "Right." But there is actually more to this.
In long ago days of yore, falling on a sword was not metaphorical. It was an honorable thing to do for another. A thing voluntarily chosen. A thing involving a long, sharp, pointed object that tended to kill when poked inside one's body by one's self.
Today, Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie (P-HWPCDLRSFC) men are being forced to fall on a sword whether they like it or not.
Matt Lauer and Garrison Keillor are the most current in this rush to judgment and need to "get it all out" so the P-HWPCDLRSFCs can get back to doing what they do best: Bashing anything not like them, and gutting the Constitution that protects and defends freedom on many levels.
For the last two months, @EWagmeister and I have been reporting on a story about serious sexual harassment allegations against Lauer. There were multiple victims. https://t.co/jW2QEeDOqo— Ramin Setoodeh (@RaminSetoodeh) November 29, 2017
As long as there are men and women, there will always be men asking to touch the goodies — and women saying hold yer horses there, big boy, sit up and beg for it.
And as long as there are women who are turned on by powerful men and who don't mind turning that process into a quid pro quo transaction, there will always be workplace hanky-panky. For goodness sake, isn't that what the celebrated TV series Mad Men and the badly written but highly popular 50 Shades of Grey all about?
Yes. They were.
And yes, real sexual harassment with real-life consequences of being fired, hurt, and killed are real.
I was once fired when I said no to a manager where I worked. I immediately went to the owners of the grocery store business and complained. They chose to believe his ginned up evidence that I was a thief. There was nothing I could do except go out and get another job.
Once, while walking in the woods in a park when I was a girl of 12, a man who was definitely a predator attempted to make me his next victim. Long story how, but I got rid of him without backing down.
Not too long ago, a man forced me into my car making me have to fight him off.
And don't get me started on my step-father's real threats of violence and death to me and my mother and siblings if I didn't do as he asked, and you know what I mean by that.
So, I know real violence and real victims exist, and if anybody says I'm saying otherwise, they are a liar. However...
I believe there are many women out there who are confusing real predators who don't ask with eager hound dogs chasing the scent and begging pretty please.**
When I was a teen, two different bosses hit on me consistently. One responded to being ignored and gave up even as he almost cried saying, "But you've got such loooong legs."
The other I told, "My mother says you are a dirty-old man and to leave me alone." He laughed and every morning after that, he walked by, nodded, politely said good morning, and moved on.
When I was newly married, a huge customer of my (now ex) husband wanted to get in my panties. He was told no and he went away.
During parties and business functions, taking walks in the park, shopping for groceries, getting a hamburger at the drive-thru, going out dancing, and everywhere else you can imagine, I've been hit on by hound dogs.
No hard feelings from any of them. No threats to fire me or withhold business from the hubby.
Sad shakes of the head, sure. Winks and twinkles when they would next see me. Of course. But respectfully taking my no.
But why now all these P-HWPCDLRSFC men being outed all of a sudden? It's simple.
The P-HWPCDLRSFC are trying to gain back control of a situation that has shed a harsh light into their dark places. Their brilliant idea is to force powerful P-HWPCDLRSFC men to fall on their swords and "take one for the team."
From this point forward they can say, "You know what, maybe we should have spoken up against Bills Clinton and Cosby et al, but damn it, it's not too late to prove we really do care for women. But more importantly, TRUMP SUCKS."
And notice the use of the phrase "inappropriate sexual behavior."
If that isn't a phrase totally designed to confuse and minimize, I don't know what is, especially among adults. What is inappropriate and harassing to one is awesome and welcome by another.
Even that phrase makes my point: P-HWPCDLRSFC cannot tell the difference and the reason they can't is because God and morals have been left out of the equation. "If it feels good, do it" became the mantra in the late 60s and anybody who didn't live by it was considered to be uptight or frigid.
Then came the laws against workplace sexual harassment and RadFems burning bras in public and then looking mean at the men who watched them.
You see how confusing it all is when there are no boundaries?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
* Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat Liberal RINO Socialist Fascist Commie.
** Gosh, just search on the phrase "sexual predator" and look at the images that come up. Talk about not understanding the meaning and turning it into high comedy.
** Gosh, just search on the phrase "sexual predator" and look at the images that come up. Talk about not understanding the meaning and turning it into high comedy.
Wednesday, November 29, 2017
Cowboys and Indians and Posers
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Which is worse:
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Which is worse:
One: Claiming inclusion in a minority class, Native American Indian, by using granny's comments that high-cheekbones on an ancestor proves he was an Indian?
Or, two: That you are outraged for the dissing that minority class has taken because somebody is lying about their inclusion to steal the honor (and jobs) from members of that minority class?
In the world of the Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat RINO Liberal Socialist Fascist Commie, why the second one is worse, going so far as to say that the use of the name Pocahontas is a racial slur.
Earth to Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat RINO Liberal Socialist Fascist Commies!
Here is the actual quote where Donald Trump said the so-called fake slur word:
So that was the ultimate statement from General Kelly, the importance. And I just want to thank you because you're very, very special people. You were here long before any of us were here, although we have a representative in Congress who, they say, was here a long time ago. They call her "Pocahontas."
See? Trump was not insulting the Code Talkers or, for that matter, any Native American Indian. He was honoring their heritage by politely pointing out that others do not honor it by their willingness to lie about their heritage, steal the thunder of another's heritage, and otherwise act like a poser. (See full video below. Quote in question starts at 11:50-ish.)
In fact, the entire brouhaha the Mainstream Media and Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat RINO Liberal Socialist Fascist Commie crowd have ginned up has itself taken away from the Code Talkers being honored.
In fact, the entire brouhaha the Mainstream Media and Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Democrat RINO Liberal Socialist Fascist Commie crowd have ginned up has itself taken away from the Code Talkers being honored.
As far back as 2012, when it came to light that Harvard and several other highly respected universities had hired Elizabeth Warren so they could claim diversity without actually having to sully their hallowed halls with yet another member of a needy minority class, Mark Steyn said —
Alas, the actual original marriage license does not list Great-Great-Great-Gran’ma as Cherokee, but let’s cut Elizabeth Fauxcahontas Crockagawea Warren some slack here. She couldn’t be black. She would if she could, but she couldn’t. But she could be 1/32nd Cherokee, and maybe get invited to a luncheon with others of her kind – “people who are like I am,” 31/32nds white – and they can all sit around celebrating their diversity together. She is a testament to America’s melting pot, composite pot, composting pot, whatever.
Sunday, November 26, 2017
Sunday Soliloquy: Camille Paglia, the anti-feminist feminist.
by Angela K. Durden
Internationally renowned American social critic Camille Paglia has been called ‘the anti-feminist feminist’. Describing contemporary feminism as a ‘gross betrayal of the radical principles of 1960s counterculture’, she stands firmly on the side of free speech and against political correctness.
Internationally renowned American social critic Camille Paglia has been called ‘the anti-feminist feminist’. Describing contemporary feminism as a ‘gross betrayal of the radical principles of 1960s counterculture’, she stands firmly on the side of free speech and against political correctness.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Gutting the Constitution: The Myth of Net Neutrality.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Remember when former US President Obama started pushing the concept of a free and open Internet as if it weren't already free and open?
And you remember when the details of it were made known that it mostly amounted to another way for the government to control the Internet by controlling the companies providing connections to our homes?
And you remember Obama wanted to classify providers as Public Utility Companies?
And you remember how Google and other tech giants applauded the legislation and thought Obama was just the best thing since sliced bread?
Because your Citizen Journalist is here to remind you of it. And why should she be reminding you of it now? Because Donald "The Hammer" Trump is getting ready to yet again rescind an Obama ruling.
This has given Mainstream Media opportunity to write articles bashing Trump, Tech Giants reason to worry, and many on Facebook and Twitter who have no clue to pass around links to online petitions to keep giving them free Internet.
When Obama classified broadband providers as utilities, he then put those under the control of Big Government. Clinton fell for the same thing when he signed into being the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, that was out of date and completely useless one day after it was signed.
I'm all for law and order, but many are useless because of the way they are worded. Think about it. The DMCA and Net Neutrality are just versions of the old laws that say silly things like —
Alright, there is no law that goes that far, but there are laws about walking your crocodile, and the DMCA and Net Neutrality did write their rules over the top like that making them completely useless and punishing, so you get my drift.
You might be asking, "Yes, Angela, but we want to be able to keep the Internet free and open to all. What if a website wants to be on the Internet but the broadband company says they can't be on it? I mean, really, Angela, isn't that just wrong?"
Maybe. Maybe not.
Free, as in the right to publish what one wants? Or free, as in not paying for it? The first already has the Constitution governing that freedom. The latter is pie-in-the-sky thinking as nothing comes with no cost.
The US Government and Tech Giants are working hand-in-hand to limit Constitutional-guaranteed freedoms. Net Neutrality is simply another way they are doing it.
By controlling the companies who bring connections to your house, the government has put themselves in control of your Internet access. That means, politicians can shut it down whenever they want to.
Tech Giants, playing the victim here, push messaging such as this one from Google, a message that many other tech giants agree with:
What companies are the worst offenders when it comes to selling "'fast lanes' that prioritize particular Internet services"?
First on the list would be Goo-Goo-Goo...that's right. You've almost got the whole word out of your mouth. That company has formed a parent company called Alphabet that is working even harder behind the scenes to control what you see and when you see it.
How about Fakebook, as many popularly call that social media giant these days? Or Twitter or any of those other social media platforms you like so well?
Yes, they too control access within their silos and try their damnedest to keep you on their site by making big promises of your ability to freely sharing information — then breaking each one and every one once they've got you hooked.
Does Twitter's shadow banning sound familiar?
Or how about Facebook limiting how many friends you can have, how many can see your posts in their feed, or severely limiting how many friends you can tell about events you're putting on?
Or Google's pushing of meaningless HTTPS certifications on all websites no matter what? Or not allowing AdWords to be used by a company working hard to protect intellectual property rights? Or favoring certain news sources to always show up in searches and all other news sources to show up on page 134,567.
Nothing is free. There is a cost to building the infrastructure. Do you know there are people who do not know that the Internet comes through a wire to their house? They think because they have Wi-fi that somehow those bits and bytes magically appear. They think that satellite magically delivers it.
Hello! Everything is hard-wired somewhere. Satellite dishes in yards pick up signals and the wire brings it inside your house to a piece of hardware that connects to your computer and/or phone.
And you pay monthly for having the convenience of that service delivered to your home. Stop paying the bill and you stop getting the service.
For Tech Giants to act like their growth was not and is not dependent on you paying your monthly bill for access to the Internet is just stupid.
Why else does Goo-Goo-Goo spend massive amounts of money to make robo calls and send snail mail to small businesses about advertising with them? Just remember what this is all about: Keeping you from freedom.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Remember all the Net Neutrality hype?
Remember when former US President Obama started pushing the concept of a free and open Internet as if it weren't already free and open?
And you remember when the details of it were made known that it mostly amounted to another way for the government to control the Internet by controlling the companies providing connections to our homes?
And you remember Obama wanted to classify providers as Public Utility Companies?
And you remember how Google and other tech giants applauded the legislation and thought Obama was just the best thing since sliced bread?
Well, maybe you don't remember. But that's okay.
Because your Citizen Journalist is here to remind you of it. And why should she be reminding you of it now? Because Donald "The Hammer" Trump is getting ready to yet again rescind an Obama ruling.
This has given Mainstream Media opportunity to write articles bashing Trump, Tech Giants reason to worry, and many on Facebook and Twitter who have no clue to pass around links to online petitions to keep giving them free Internet.
When Obama classified broadband providers as utilities, he then put those under the control of Big Government. Clinton fell for the same thing when he signed into being the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, that was out of date and completely useless one day after it was signed.
I'm all for law and order, but many are useless because of the way they are worded. Think about it. The DMCA and Net Neutrality are just versions of the old laws that say silly things like —
"It is illegal to walk your crocodile without a leash along Main Street during a full moon while your ex-wife is visiting her mother to attend her father's funeral."
Alright, there is no law that goes that far, but there are laws about walking your crocodile, and the DMCA and Net Neutrality did write their rules over the top like that making them completely useless and punishing, so you get my drift.
You might be asking, "Yes, Angela, but we want to be able to keep the Internet free and open to all. What if a website wants to be on the Internet but the broadband company says they can't be on it? I mean, really, Angela, isn't that just wrong?"
Maybe. Maybe not.
What does one mean by free?
Free, as in the right to publish what one wants? Or free, as in not paying for it? The first already has the Constitution governing that freedom. The latter is pie-in-the-sky thinking as nothing comes with no cost.
The US Government and Tech Giants are working hand-in-hand to limit Constitutional-guaranteed freedoms. Net Neutrality is simply another way they are doing it.
By controlling the companies who bring connections to your house, the government has put themselves in control of your Internet access. That means, politicians can shut it down whenever they want to.
Tech Giants, playing the victim here, push messaging such as this one from Google, a message that many other tech giants agree with:
“Our values remain the same: The Internet should be competitive and open. That means no Internet access provider should block or degrade Internet traffic, nor should they sell ‘fast lanes’ that prioritize particular Internet services over others. These rules should apply regardless of whether you’re accessing the Internet using a cable connection, a wireless service, or any other technology.”
Let's break down this self-serving statement, shall we?
What companies are the worst offenders when it comes to selling "'fast lanes' that prioritize particular Internet services"?
First on the list would be Goo-Goo-Goo...that's right. You've almost got the whole word out of your mouth. That company has formed a parent company called Alphabet that is working even harder behind the scenes to control what you see and when you see it.
How about Fakebook, as many popularly call that social media giant these days? Or Twitter or any of those other social media platforms you like so well?
Yes, they too control access within their silos and try their damnedest to keep you on their site by making big promises of your ability to freely sharing information — then breaking each one and every one once they've got you hooked.
Does Twitter's shadow banning sound familiar?
Or how about Facebook limiting how many friends you can have, how many can see your posts in their feed, or severely limiting how many friends you can tell about events you're putting on?
Or Google's pushing of meaningless HTTPS certifications on all websites no matter what? Or not allowing AdWords to be used by a company working hard to protect intellectual property rights? Or favoring certain news sources to always show up in searches and all other news sources to show up on page 134,567.
You're access to the Internet has always been controlled.
Nothing is free. There is a cost to building the infrastructure. Do you know there are people who do not know that the Internet comes through a wire to their house? They think because they have Wi-fi that somehow those bits and bytes magically appear. They think that satellite magically delivers it.
Hello! Everything is hard-wired somewhere. Satellite dishes in yards pick up signals and the wire brings it inside your house to a piece of hardware that connects to your computer and/or phone.
And you pay monthly for having the convenience of that service delivered to your home. Stop paying the bill and you stop getting the service.
For Tech Giants to act like their growth was not and is not dependent on you paying your monthly bill for access to the Internet is just stupid.
But even Tech Giants are seeing the writing on the wall.
Why else does Goo-Goo-Goo spend massive amounts of money to make robo calls and send snail mail to small businesses about advertising with them? Just remember what this is all about: Keeping you from freedom.
Thursday, November 23, 2017
Killing the Imperfect: Eugenics is alive and well.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Hitler would be proud of Iceland for continuing his work on producing a pure race.
Adolph would also be proud of CBS News for bringing to light how well the cleansing program is working there in Iceland.
Thanks to prenatal testing methods to identify subpar humans who will be aborted before they are born, Iceland is "on pace" to eliminate Down's Syndrome from their population.
Sounds like a phrase Hitler would've used about the productivity reports of his ovens such as this totally made up but completely plausible conversation:
Hitler: Where are the oven reports?
Secretary: Why, let me go get them for ya.
Hitler: Hmmmm...I see Zyklon-B usage is up at Birkenau, but body count is down. Get me Kremer on the phone.
Secretary: Yes, sir.
Kremer: Hello?
Secretary: Heil Hitler.
Kremer: Heil Hitler. Who is this?
Secretary: Mein and yein's fuhrer wants to talk to you.
Kremer: Holy shit. About what?
Secretary: You'll have to find out for yourself, but he was asking to see the oven reports.
Kremer: Damn. Okay. I was somewhat expecting this.
Secretary: One moment. I'll transfer you...Sir, Kremer is on the line.
Hitler: Kremer?
Kremer: Heil Hitler.
Hitler: Stop it with the ass kissing. I see you are not "on pace" to cleansing the world of subpar humans. So tell me, Kremer, why is your Zyklon-B usage up and body count down?
Kremer: Ugh...ummmm...well...ugh. Seems the railroad cars have been running slow. I'm killing them as fast as they arrive.
Hitler: Hmmm...railroad cars running slow, huh?
This is wrong. But caring Socialists just don't see it that way.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Hitler would be proud of Iceland for continuing his work on producing a pure race.
Adolph would also be proud of CBS News for bringing to light how well the cleansing program is working there in Iceland.
Thanks to prenatal testing methods to identify subpar humans who will be aborted before they are born, Iceland is "on pace" to eliminate Down's Syndrome from their population.
"On pace."
Sounds like a phrase Hitler would've used about the productivity reports of his ovens such as this totally made up but completely plausible conversation:
Hitler: Where are the oven reports?
Secretary: Why, let me go get them for ya.
Hitler: Hmmmm...I see Zyklon-B usage is up at Birkenau, but body count is down. Get me Kremer on the phone.
Secretary: Yes, sir.
Kremer: Hello?
Secretary: Heil Hitler.
Kremer: Heil Hitler. Who is this?
Secretary: Mein and yein's fuhrer wants to talk to you.
Kremer: Holy shit. About what?
Secretary: You'll have to find out for yourself, but he was asking to see the oven reports.
Kremer: Damn. Okay. I was somewhat expecting this.
Secretary: One moment. I'll transfer you...Sir, Kremer is on the line.
Hitler: Kremer?
Kremer: Heil Hitler.
Hitler: Stop it with the ass kissing. I see you are not "on pace" to cleansing the world of subpar humans. So tell me, Kremer, why is your Zyklon-B usage up and body count down?
Kremer: Ugh...ummmm...well...ugh. Seems the railroad cars have been running slow. I'm killing them as fast as they arrive.
Hitler: Hmmm...railroad cars running slow, huh?
See how it works?
This is what is happening in Iceland except instead of gassing and ovens they are using prenatal testing and telling women that "everybody is doing it" and "why not do your part in caring for the country?"This is wrong. But caring Socialists just don't see it that way.
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Monday, November 20, 2017
The Art of War: Elephants and "Squirrel!"
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Make no mistake about it. The latest "Squirrel!" technique deployed by the Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commies [P-HWPCLDRSFCs] is the elephant story hitting the headlines featuring Big-Bad-Meanie Trump reversing Obama The Saint's ban on importing elephant parts into the US.
Motivated by jealousy while claiming they care more than me about everything, the P-HWPCLDRSFCs are surprised when the end result of their caring turns out badly.
For instance: Raging wildfires in California. Sure, there are wildfires in other places and, of course these rage. But Cali sure has a lot more than just about anywhere else. So the question must be asked: Why?
I care for animals. When I see a turtle on the road and it is within my power to do so, I take it across the road in the direction it was headed.
But the P-HWPCLDRSFCs won't allow perfectly fine controlled burns of underbrush in case living under that brush is one of those little turtles (or whatever endangered species du jour they are focused on).
So, massive amounts of fuel accrue and then every animal dies. But that is okay because, you see, those fires are the fault of uncaring, animal hating, underbrush-destroying Conservatives, small-government Libertarians, and freedom-loving, Constitution-protecting Citizens everywhere — never the silly policies of the righteous P-HWPCLDRSFCs .
Around the world, animal populations are managed so that balance in an area is maintained.* Too many of one animal eating too many of another makes for a trickle down scenario and next thing you know dogs, cats, old people, little children, and gardens are being eaten and trampled by alligators, bears, boars, deer, and lions and tigers and elephants roaming the suburbs.
Zambia and Zimbabwe have an elephant problem. Indiscriminate killing led to a a close extinction. The countries enacted measures to protect the elephant. But too many elephants in an area, or old and sick elephants spreading disease, means measures must be taken to protect the rest of the herd and the people who live there.
So what do they, and other countries with similar problems, do? Why, they invite hunters to come and do the work for them. These hunters pay a price to legally shoot, thus raising much-needed revenue, and they responsibly stay within the boundaries of killing only those marked and stay within quantity limits.
*Not all P-HWPCLDRSFCs are vegetarian. Eating their fair share of burgers and steaks means they are also "culling the herd." But, hey, who am I to point out their hypocrisy.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Make no mistake about it. The latest "Squirrel!" technique deployed by the Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commies [P-HWPCLDRSFCs] is the elephant story hitting the headlines featuring Big-Bad-Meanie Trump reversing Obama The Saint's ban on importing elephant parts into the US.
Motivated by jealousy while claiming they care more than me about everything, the P-HWPCLDRSFCs are surprised when the end result of their caring turns out badly.
For instance: Raging wildfires in California. Sure, there are wildfires in other places and, of course these rage. But Cali sure has a lot more than just about anywhere else. So the question must be asked: Why?
I posit the following reason: Political Correctness.
I care for animals. When I see a turtle on the road and it is within my power to do so, I take it across the road in the direction it was headed.
But the P-HWPCLDRSFCs won't allow perfectly fine controlled burns of underbrush in case living under that brush is one of those little turtles (or whatever endangered species du jour they are focused on).
Treated in the same fashion by the P-HWPCLDRSFCs is the practice of culling.
Around the world, animal populations are managed so that balance in an area is maintained.* Too many of one animal eating too many of another makes for a trickle down scenario and next thing you know dogs, cats, old people, little children, and gardens are being eaten and trampled by alligators, bears, boars, deer, and lions and tigers and elephants roaming the suburbs.
Zambia and Zimbabwe have an elephant problem. Indiscriminate killing led to a a close extinction. The countries enacted measures to protect the elephant. But too many elephants in an area, or old and sick elephants spreading disease, means measures must be taken to protect the rest of the herd and the people who live there.
So what do they, and other countries with similar problems, do? Why, they invite hunters to come and do the work for them. These hunters pay a price to legally shoot, thus raising much-needed revenue, and they responsibly stay within the boundaries of killing only those marked and stay within quantity limits.
But what about the headline of Trump's reversing Obama The Saint's ban and then holding off on the order?
The P-HWPCLDRSFCs say it is because Trump's son asked him to make it legal to bring in elephant trophy hunt booty and Daddy couldn't say no. Then you read that Trump is holding off on reversing the ban and all the P-HWPCLDRSFCs claim it was their powerful petitions that made him do it.
But the real reason is Trump is holding off is because of Sun-tzu's The Art of War. "Is this the hill on which I need to die?" is the one question every warrior asks. To answer that question, Donald "The Hammer" Trump must understand the concepts of Potential Energy, Strategic Offensive, and The Fray which state:
Potential Energy:
"Orderly disorder is based on careful division; Courageous fear, on potential energy; Strong weakness, on troop dispositions."
Strategic Offensive:
"Ultimate excellence lies not in winning every battle but in defeating the enemy without ever fighting. The highest form of warfare is to attack strategy itself."
The Fray:
"Take a roundabout route, and lure the enemy with some gain."
"The Hammer" understands those concepts and knows the real reason these anti-him headlines are showing up.
It's the latest in the constant cry of the puppet masters yelling "Squirrel!" and getting their legions of the P-HWPCLDRSFCs to look away from anything that supports freedom and takes away power from the puppet masters.
Sunday, November 19, 2017
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Evil has no conscience.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
After posting comments you see to your right, one young fellow I know in the real world asked the question, "When are we going to wake up?"
To your question "when are we going to wake up?" I say some people are woke. That a person secretly abuses others is not an unknown. The entire history of mankind is full of such examples, some of whom are the biggest hypocrites ever — preaching from pulpits, ruling from benches, and using the force of law to control the private lives of others, as well as tormenting their spouses and children using threats of torture, punishment, and death if they speak up.
Once these things are discovered, laws exist to punish the abuser. Now, will anybody go on the record against the abuser himself (and in a lot of instances, herself)?
First, most people are truly good and simply cannot conceive of the concept of evil much less the reality of it. Therefore, even when they see it, will convince themselves it is they who are misinterpreting what they see because, gee, their good friend, person they voted for, teacher of their children, preacher of their sermons, etc., simply are such awesome people that they couldn't do it.
And besides, they say, evil stuff like that is only imagined in the minds of mentally ill people and it doesn't really happen. Which brings us to the next point: That mindset makes whistle blowers into the enemy and they are castigated by well-intentioned good people.
Third, Evil is happy that good people cannot conceive of evil and will constantly exploit their good natures and lack of understanding of the full scope of human conditions.
Lastly, evil exists across all strata be it economic, class, nationality, color, religion (including atheism), politics, job description, education level, gender, and age. Evil will use everything available to it to fool victims in order to get away with it. Evil has no conscience. Evil seeks its own interests; no other interest does it acknowledge as being relevant. Evil will even accuse other Evils to divert attention away from themselves.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Last, but not least, Evil exists across all strata be it economic, class, nationality, color, religion (including atheism), politics, job description, education level, gender, and age. Evil will use everything available to fool victims in order to get away with their crime. Evil has no conscience.
Evil seeks its own interests; no other interest does it acknowledge as being relevant.
Evil will even accuse other Evils to divert attention away from themselves.
Alabama's Judge Roy Moore is being accused of fondling underage girls. Whether or not that is true remains to be seen. However, as if Politically Correct Democrat Liberal Socialist Fascist Commies can't and would never do anything like it, the story circulating on Facebook via comments goes along these lines:
"See, the AltRight judge is a hypocrite, and..." blah, blah, blah, more of the same types of comments that make the assumption that only conservatives of any stripe are hypocrites and do these bad things.
But how about all those pussy-hat wearing women who just love to defend rapist Bill Clinton while demonizing all of his female victims who spoke out against his evil?
See? Evil is everywhere.
 |
| Alabama's Judge Roy Moore. |
My answer to him was this:
To your question "when are we going to wake up?" I say some people are woke. That a person secretly abuses others is not an unknown. The entire history of mankind is full of such examples, some of whom are the biggest hypocrites ever — preaching from pulpits, ruling from benches, and using the force of law to control the private lives of others, as well as tormenting their spouses and children using threats of torture, punishment, and death if they speak up.
Once these things are discovered, laws exist to punish the abuser. Now, will anybody go on the record against the abuser himself (and in a lot of instances, herself)?
That is a complicated question with a complicated answer.
First, most people are truly good and simply cannot conceive of the concept of evil much less the reality of it. Therefore, even when they see it, will convince themselves it is they who are misinterpreting what they see because, gee, their good friend, person they voted for, teacher of their children, preacher of their sermons, etc., simply are such awesome people that they couldn't do it.
And besides, they say, evil stuff like that is only imagined in the minds of mentally ill people and it doesn't really happen. Which brings us to the next point: That mindset makes whistle blowers into the enemy and they are castigated by well-intentioned good people.
Third, Evil is happy that good people cannot conceive of evil and will constantly exploit their good natures and lack of understanding of the full scope of human conditions.
Lastly, evil exists across all strata be it economic, class, nationality, color, religion (including atheism), politics, job description, education level, gender, and age. Evil will use everything available to it to fool victims in order to get away with it. Evil has no conscience. Evil seeks its own interests; no other interest does it acknowledge as being relevant. Evil will even accuse other Evils to divert attention away from themselves.
Friday, November 17, 2017
Milton Friedman: People have responsibility to fix problems.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
And they do it best in a free market. It is possible this is Bernie Sanders in the video as the gap in the front teeth sure do seem to match up. In any case, Milton makes the case for free markets, capitalism, and small government.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Thursday, November 16, 2017
Democrat fear-mongering at its finest.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
The headline above anchored a long article that is super silly on its face.
The headline is ludicrous and the article itself could only be believed by PHWPCLIDRSFCs. That anybody in this day and age of digital transmission could believe there is only one copy of anybody's tax return and that it could be held in a safe in one location, well, one must laugh at the naivety of those folks.
Furthermore, individual privacy is a protection against government abuse, but that hasn't stopped the IRS from ever looking at anybody's tax return because that's the business they are in. They never take anybody's word for anything — and don't we know it.
The premise of this article assumes that Trump sent in one written packet of a tax return with the envelope marked "I promise it is accurate, so you don't have to look at it and if you do, why I'll drop a bomb on ya. Check coming soonish."
Ridiculous.
As it is now, the IRS has been used by Democrats, RINOs, and other socialist fascist commies to punish, harass, control, and otherwise slow the progress of small business owners, big business, researchers, professors, teachers, parents, concerned citizens, and non- or not-for-profits who do not agree with them.
Worse, these same broad and illegal powers are also used by Democrats, RINOs, and other socialist fascist commies to reward, support, and otherwise embolden foreign and domestic terrorist organizations and individuals of every ilk who seek to destroy the rights and freedoms of all US citizens by pushing agendas that are anti everything, like Christian, Jewish, peace loving, and so forth.
The entire reason this false article showed up now with its fear mongering is because of the big push to give tax breaks to the middle class. A class, by the way, that is the largest source of funds the government has.
Big Government hates the idea their party fund could dry up. I say let it dry up and let them live on a believable budget like the rest of us.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
The headline above anchored a long article that is super silly on its face.
The body of the article is full of untruths and had to be written by a Big Government flack, that is, a Pussy-Hat Wearing Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commie [PHWPCLIDRSFC's] crying into their latté. You'll crack up when you read it.
The headline is ludicrous and the article itself could only be believed by PHWPCLIDRSFCs. That anybody in this day and age of digital transmission could believe there is only one copy of anybody's tax return and that it could be held in a safe in one location, well, one must laugh at the naivety of those folks.
The entire article smells.
Furthermore, individual privacy is a protection against government abuse, but that hasn't stopped the IRS from ever looking at anybody's tax return because that's the business they are in. They never take anybody's word for anything — and don't we know it.
The premise of this article assumes that Trump sent in one written packet of a tax return with the envelope marked "I promise it is accurate, so you don't have to look at it and if you do, why I'll drop a bomb on ya. Check coming soonish."
Ridiculous.
Beware the collapse of the IRS?
Really? Why should I beware the collapse of one of the biggest for-hire by PHWPCLIDRSFCs bully agencies on the planet? I wish its ability to illegally use its power was enforced.
As it is now, the IRS has been used by Democrats, RINOs, and other socialist fascist commies to punish, harass, control, and otherwise slow the progress of small business owners, big business, researchers, professors, teachers, parents, concerned citizens, and non- or not-for-profits who do not agree with them.
Worse, these same broad and illegal powers are also used by Democrats, RINOs, and other socialist fascist commies to reward, support, and otherwise embolden foreign and domestic terrorist organizations and individuals of every ilk who seek to destroy the rights and freedoms of all US citizens by pushing agendas that are anti everything, like Christian, Jewish, peace loving, and so forth.
But why now this article?
Big Government hates the idea their party fund could dry up. I say let it dry up and let them live on a believable budget like the rest of us.
Big vote tomorrow in the House. Tax cuts are getting close!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2017
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Hump Day Quickie: Messy people and hissy fits.
by Angela K. Durden
Shared on social media by a man who has hissy fits when his dance partner cannot follow him. I bet he also has hissy fits when his fries get delivered jumbled up.
Shared on social media by a man who has hissy fits when his dance partner cannot follow him. I bet he also has hissy fits when his fries get delivered jumbled up.
 |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Monday, November 13, 2017
No sense of humor at all: Bruce and Caitlyn bathroom doors.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
The PCLDRSFCs said that Dodie's was turning transgender women into a joke. The Dallas Morning News’ Dom DiFurio saw the signs. He publicly said that the signs stigmatize transgenders and play into the area's conservative audience, and that is why he felt he should report this story.
Dom saw the doors and said, "Sweet! Inflammatory story falls right into my lap. Ratings uptick. More onscreen face time for meeeeee. Thank you, Universe!"
I say Dom thanked Universe because I'm not sure if he believes in God or not and, well...I wouldn't want to offend him by implying that, now would I?
Anyway, Dodie's simply was exercising their right to free speech and in no way did they put up signage that made fun of Jenner or trans-people. In fact, you saw the pictures above. Don't you agree that both the photos were excellent shots of each of Jenner's primes?
But that doesn't matter to the perpetually offended PCLDRSFCs, and Dodie's had to explain to them that they were just starting a discussion about the negative influence of political correctness.
What is even funnier — and sadder — is that someone else said that that great and awesome picture of Caitlyn Jenner was going to make other transgender women feel ugly because they weren't that far along in their process. So, instead of celebrating the successful end of a long and torturous journey, they whine "she's too pretty and I'm not."
And that statement, ladies and gentlemen, explains why the perpetually offended PCLDRSFCs are nuts. Oops...did I just say that? Let me clarify. It explains the psychosis of political correctness.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Allen, Texas. Best known for...well, not sure what the town is known for in the past. But it made the news online in The Daily Wire when Dodie's Place Cajun Bar & Grill did some decorating.
 |
| Screenshot from DailyWire.com |
Dodie's is the place "Where All Your Friends Are!" What a friendly place. Lots of humor and laughing and food and such as that. And forty TVs to watch all four major sport groups.
Then the Politically Correct Liberal Democratic RINO Socialist Fascist Commies [PCLDRSFCs] came to eat — and the Texas Patty Melt hit the fan.
I call bull on Dom's reason.
Dom saw the doors and said, "Sweet! Inflammatory story falls right into my lap. Ratings uptick. More onscreen face time for meeeeee. Thank you, Universe!"
I say Dom thanked Universe because I'm not sure if he believes in God or not and, well...I wouldn't want to offend him by implying that, now would I?
Anyway, Dodie's simply was exercising their right to free speech and in no way did they put up signage that made fun of Jenner or trans-people. In fact, you saw the pictures above. Don't you agree that both the photos were excellent shots of each of Jenner's primes?
But that doesn't matter to the perpetually offended PCLDRSFCs, and Dodie's had to explain to them that they were just starting a discussion about the negative influence of political correctness.
What is even funnier — and sadder — is that someone else said that that great and awesome picture of Caitlyn Jenner was going to make other transgender women feel ugly because they weren't that far along in their process. So, instead of celebrating the successful end of a long and torturous journey, they whine "she's too pretty and I'm not."
And that statement, ladies and gentlemen, explains why the perpetually offended PCLDRSFCs are nuts. Oops...did I just say that? Let me clarify. It explains the psychosis of political correctness.
Sunday, November 12, 2017
White man shoots up white church, Air Force gets the blame. Gun-control spin ramps up.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
I agree. The Air Force should have paid attention to the details. But the guy was going to do what the guy was going to do and nothing would have stopped him from obtaining guns illegally, or making a bomb and driving up to the door of the church and boom!
The shooter was angry and was intent on doing as much harm as possible.
Thank goodness a law-abiding citizen came and shot him.
No law can stop someone, such as this shooter, from doing evil deeds. And after each and every one, we see headline after headline quoting citizens saying, "They should just get rid of all the guns." Yes, these are usually crying when they say it. These people might also believe that the reason a woman gets raped is because she's showing some ankle.
I'm not hard-hearted. I'm not a cold bitch. But I am pragmatic.
Every dictator and terrorist, and any government that marches toward fascist, socialist, or communist methods (no matter what they call themselves) always begins their control by disarming law-abiding citizenry. That there is major push back in the US on this topic should be a source of comfort.
Constitutional protections are being gutted on many fronts, including free speech, rights to property ownership, and more by Tech Giants, The Majors and The Bigs of media and entertainment, and organized religion, all of whom aim to keep people from thinking for themselves.
The Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commies are all working hard to get control of your property and take away your rights all in the name of One World Government. I am not a fan of that and won't support it. Freedom always comes with a price. Some say that price is high and unacceptable.
But I know what price the lack of freedom exacts and only the Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commies like that equation.
Saturday, November 11, 2017
HTTPS is fake security.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
"Https as a baseline to play" is an incorrect assumption on your part. First, your statement assumes every site that is not https is a thief. They are not.
Second, your statement assumes that regular folks who use third-party payment processors such as PayPal, Stripe, and other merchant card processors are not handling their business properly when, in point of fact, they are handling it well by employing vendors who do have https certification and who go even further: Vendors deploy massive and ever-updated security measures to combat fraud and hackers.
Third, your assumption is that somehow https magically grants online protections. It does not. In fact, data protection is only as good as a SaaS company builds it and no https certification even looks at any company's software to determine how well they've built it. I know this as I have a SaaS company. The protections we've built in I won't even tell you, but data is extremely safe. Though it is rated https, we did not build our site to get that rating and did not even figure it into the why or how we built our internals.
Fourth, your "baseline to play" argument does not solve the problem of fraud. Anybody can write a bad check. At checkouts, cashiers regularly swipe a special pen across money to determine if it is legitimate currency. Hackers never stop and if you want to talk about https protections, what the hell happened with Equifax? Who left the barn door open there, huh?
Fifth, let me predict further that in 10 years the Equifax's of the world will not exist. We are now seeing the downward spiral of Tech Giants. The more Google and Amazon aren't moving money through their systems, the more they squeeze the little guy for more cash for an iffy service that adds no value. And that is why Google is requiring https certification: Additional revenues they need, and they need it badly.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
A woman on a social media portal made the statement that https should be the "baseline to play" in order to have a website. Here is my reply to her about why she is wrong:
"Https as a baseline to play" is an incorrect assumption on your part. First, your statement assumes every site that is not https is a thief. They are not.
Second, your statement assumes that regular folks who use third-party payment processors such as PayPal, Stripe, and other merchant card processors are not handling their business properly when, in point of fact, they are handling it well by employing vendors who do have https certification and who go even further: Vendors deploy massive and ever-updated security measures to combat fraud and hackers.
Third, your assumption is that somehow https magically grants online protections. It does not. In fact, data protection is only as good as a SaaS company builds it and no https certification even looks at any company's software to determine how well they've built it. I know this as I have a SaaS company. The protections we've built in I won't even tell you, but data is extremely safe. Though it is rated https, we did not build our site to get that rating and did not even figure it into the why or how we built our internals.
Fourth, your "baseline to play" argument does not solve the problem of fraud. Anybody can write a bad check. At checkouts, cashiers regularly swipe a special pen across money to determine if it is legitimate currency. Hackers never stop and if you want to talk about https protections, what the hell happened with Equifax? Who left the barn door open there, huh?
Fifth, let me predict further that in 10 years the Equifax's of the world will not exist. We are now seeing the downward spiral of Tech Giants. The more Google and Amazon aren't moving money through their systems, the more they squeeze the little guy for more cash for an iffy service that adds no value. And that is why Google is requiring https certification: Additional revenues they need, and they need it badly.
Give me some men who are stout-hearted men.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
You who have dreams
If you act, they will come true
To turn your dream to a fact
It's up to you
If you have the soul and the spirit
Never fear it, you'll see it through.
Hearts can inspire other hearts with their fire.
For the strong obey when a strong man
shows them the way.
OHHHHHH!
Give me some men who are stout-hearted men
Who will fight for the right they adore.
Start me with ten who are stout-hearted men,
And I'll soon give you ten thousand more.
Oh, shoulder to shoulder, and bolder and bolder
They grow as they go to the fore.
Then there's nothing in the world can halt or mar a plan
When stout-hearted men can stick together man to man.
Songwriters:
ROMBERG, SIGMUND & HAMMERSTEIN, OSCAR II
Stout-hearted Men lyrics
© Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., IMAGEM U.S. LLC
Friday, November 10, 2017
Algorithmed Out: Twitter admits to shadow banning on behalf of Ol' Hill.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
In 2016 and 2017, I called out Twitter on their shadow banning. As a Citizen Journalist writing on the subject of protections given citizens by the Constitution, and how those are being destroyed by Tech Giants, and The Majors and The Bigs of entertainment, I was and still am regularly "algorithmed out" of information sharing.Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
I cried foul and was told by many I was either being a whiny-butt, paranoid, or thought more of myself than it was necessary to think because why would Twitter target little ol' me?
Many say, "Twitter is a private company and can do as they wish." True. They are private.
But when they control the flow of information, they have a higher duty to users.
If they want to algorithm out users posts, they should tell users each and every time they do. Then users can say, "Okay. I'll take my messaging elsewhere." Then when their user base — and by user base I mean eyeballs they can show ads to — dries up, let them come back begging.
Reported in Lawnewz.com, Twitter's general counsel admitted to shadow banning on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign by regularly not sharing tweets with certain hashtags. Quoted from Twitter General Counsel Edgett's prepared testimony to the Senate Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism delivered on October 31:
In the two months preceding the election, around 57,000 users posted approximately 426,000 unique Tweets containing variations of the 7 #PodestaEmails hashtag. Approximately one quarter (25%) of those Tweets received internal tags from our automation detection systems that hid them from searches. As described in greater detail below, our systems detected and hid just under half (48%) of the Tweets relating to variants of another notable hashtag, #DNCLeak, which concerned the disclosure of leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee. These steps were part of our general efforts at the time to fight automation and spam on our platform across all areas.
 |
| Screen snip from Lawnewz.com |
Twitter's testimony is self-serving.
Does Twitter take the same view about their tweeters as generals do about the enemy? You know, kill them all and let God sort it out. Sure seems so.
Thursday, November 9, 2017
Jesus is turning over in His grave...oh...wait...He's resurrected.
by Angela K. Durden
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio is at it again. Now that Pope Francis has his dream job of being leader of all Catholics in the world, why, he is making sure you can only dance with the one who brung ya — and that date is The Church, approved and sanctioned and loved by terrorists everywhere.
I hate being right all the time, but what can I do? When Jorge was hired as pope, I said, "The man is a fake and a fraud, but he will play well on the little screen." Now, did I know the man before I heard of him moving up the ranks in the Catholic Church? I did not.
But just like I said Susan Smith killed her children and called her tears crocodile at her first news conference. And just like I said Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn child the first time I clapped eyes on his pretty face trying so hard to convince Diane Sawyer he didn't do it. And just like I said about Bills Cosby and Clinton that they hate women and I wouldn't want to be alone with either of them.
Yes, just like them and others whose creepy evil I see long before others do, and when I say they are evil and am told I'm a nut, who was right about Jorge the first time she saw him? That's right.
That would be me, your Citizen Journalist.
And here we have more proof that the guy hired for his warm and fuzzy "ain't I a sweet old man" public outreach skills is actually a mouthpiece for terrorists, otherwise known as the Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commies.
Oh, intones Jorge, the biggest threat we have is climate change.
Solution: A one-world government, of course.
Oh me oh my, says Jorge, it's best not to think for yourself.
Solution: Let all the smart people in the one-world government do yer thinking.
Oh, warns Jorge, it is dangerous and wrong to have an immediate relationship with Jesus and is strictly verboten.
Solution: Come to church and we'll tell Jesus what you want, and Jesus wants a one-world government. (See the video below...if you can stomach it.)
Technology inventor protecting creator's copyrights. Business writer, novelist, songwriter, and Citizen Journalist.
I hate being right all the time, but what can I do? When Jorge was hired as pope, I said, "The man is a fake and a fraud, but he will play well on the little screen." Now, did I know the man before I heard of him moving up the ranks in the Catholic Church? I did not.
But just like I said Susan Smith killed her children and called her tears crocodile at her first news conference. And just like I said Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn child the first time I clapped eyes on his pretty face trying so hard to convince Diane Sawyer he didn't do it. And just like I said about Bills Cosby and Clinton that they hate women and I wouldn't want to be alone with either of them.
That would be me, your Citizen Journalist.
And here we have more proof that the guy hired for his warm and fuzzy "ain't I a sweet old man" public outreach skills is actually a mouthpiece for terrorists, otherwise known as the Politically Correct Liberal Democrat RINO Socialist Fascist Commies.
Oh me oh my, says Jorge, it's best not to think for yourself.
Solution: Let all the smart people in the one-world government do yer thinking.
Oh, warns Jorge, it is dangerous and wrong to have an immediate relationship with Jesus and is strictly verboten.
Solution: Come to church and we'll tell Jesus what you want, and Jesus wants a one-world government. (See the video below...if you can stomach it.)
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)