Wednesday, June 21, 2017
"Uncle Joe" Biden's fetish?
by Angela K. Durden
The internet abounds with pictures of "Uncle Joe" Biden standing behind a woman, putting his hands on her shoulders or other places his hands shouldn't be, and kissing her through her hair. Furthermore, he loves doing it in front of a camera in public.
I would call that a fetish.
A YouTube.com search on the phrase "Joe Biden kissing" brings up images I would prefer never to have seen. None of the females seem to be enjoying it, either. Sure, a couple of women are smiling but their hands are keeping his in check, and it's a smile of holy cow what now? Really?
Recently, Biden kissed a young black woman at a college graduation ceremony. Her twitter comment was very clear: She was not happy with it. See? Her emoji clearly states yuck on Uncle Joe.
"Gotta love Uncle Joe!"
"When you get a kiss planted on your face through your hair you know the love is real!"
True, the love is real and it is his love for the fetish that's all about him. But the DPS* and those they have fooled have turned this man's creepy love of self — and by extension, hatred of females because he doesn't ask permission — into a political statement against President Trump.
Go ahead. In your mind's eye replace Uncle Joe's face with Trump's in each of these images. If Trump was doing that, the DPS* on social platforms and in mainstream media would be calling him a woman-hating rapist and demanding his execution forthwith.
The internet abounds with pictures of "Uncle Joe" Biden standing behind a woman, putting his hands on her shoulders or other places his hands shouldn't be, and kissing her through her hair. Furthermore, he loves doing it in front of a camera in public.
I would call that a fetish.
A YouTube.com search on the phrase "Joe Biden kissing" brings up images I would prefer never to have seen. None of the females seem to be enjoying it, either. Sure, a couple of women are smiling but their hands are keeping his in check, and it's a smile of holy cow what now? Really?
 |
| Google search screenshot |
Recently, Biden kissed a young black woman at a college graduation ceremony. Her twitter comment was very clear: She was not happy with it. See? Her emoji clearly states yuck on Uncle Joe.
But here is what is showing up as interpreted on social media by the DPS*.
"When you get a kiss planted on your face through your hair you know the love is real!"
True, the love is real and it is his love for the fetish that's all about him. But the DPS* and those they have fooled have turned this man's creepy love of self — and by extension, hatred of females because he doesn't ask permission — into a political statement against President Trump.
Go ahead. In your mind's eye replace Uncle Joe's face with Trump's in each of these images. If Trump was doing that, the DPS* on social platforms and in mainstream media would be calling him a woman-hating rapist and demanding his execution forthwith.
*Democratic Progressive Socialists
Georgia's Handel wins by 4%. DPS, Hollywood, Ossoff stunned.
by Angela K. Durden
After running a campaign where "Pretty Boy Jon" Ossoff said the main reason Karen "Pearls" Handel was unfit to hold office was because she spent way too much money on office chairs, the Democratic Progressive Socialist (DPS) candidate for Georgia's 6th Congressional District spent over $23 million to Republican Handel's $4.5 million.
Still Ossoff lost 52% to 48%; a 3% higher margin than when "The Hammer" beat "Hill the Pill" in the same district a mere eight months ago raising hopes of DPSes across the nation. CNN rightly called this the "most expensive House race in history."
Before it was over, Georgia was sick of all the campaign ads on both sides. Of course, Georgia businesses were happy to have the money spent here. But was it? Sure, some, like for food and hotels maybe. But did Georgia film crews get the jobs or were these teams imported in from foreign climes? Does anybody know? Who knows?
Watching the ads, it is clear politics might not be Ossoff's strong suit. He sure was pretty in all those slick productions.
Since "Pretty Boy Jon" has so many friends in Hollywood, maybe all the Beautiful People can get him a part in their next project. Ossoff sure is pretty. The camera loves his eyes. Why, he could play just about any role. And his ego is already big. See? A perfect fit.
Ossoff can't move to Hollywood. And it's a good thing he didn't win, too. Since he couldn't leave her side, what would his girlfriend do had he won?
Breaking the rules from the very beginning of the race, Ossoff didn't live in the very district he wanted to represent. He got away with that infraction by citing as his main reason that thing all Socialists claim is more important than anything:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Ossoff cared about his girlfriend to whom he was affianced and she was going to Emory and she just had to live close by the school and he just had to live with her and nobody but nobody was going to stop him from supporting her dreams and goals, no sirree.
Still, Ossoff was gracious in his loss saying, "This is not the outcome any of us were hoping for. But this is the beginning of something much bigger than us."
That quote might sound like a platitude, but it does, in fact, stay within DPS' marching orders: Keep in lockstep as one shouts the party line.
Social media is already lit up with explanations of why he lost. The best one yet? Ossoff's opponent party cheated by having the borders of the district changed to have more of their friends in it.
Rule breakers complaining about breaking rules? Folks, you can't make this stuff up.
After running a campaign where "Pretty Boy Jon" Ossoff said the main reason Karen "Pearls" Handel was unfit to hold office was because she spent way too much money on office chairs, the Democratic Progressive Socialist (DPS) candidate for Georgia's 6th Congressional District spent over $23 million to Republican Handel's $4.5 million.
 |
| politics.blog.ajc.com |
Before it was over, Georgia was sick of all the campaign ads on both sides. Of course, Georgia businesses were happy to have the money spent here. But was it? Sure, some, like for food and hotels maybe. But did Georgia film crews get the jobs or were these teams imported in from foreign climes? Does anybody know? Who knows?
Watching the ads, it is clear politics might not be Ossoff's strong suit. He sure was pretty in all those slick productions.
Since "Pretty Boy Jon" has so many friends in Hollywood, maybe all the Beautiful People can get him a part in their next project. Ossoff sure is pretty. The camera loves his eyes. Why, he could play just about any role. And his ego is already big. See? A perfect fit.
Oh, hell. What was I thinking?
Ossoff can't move to Hollywood. And it's a good thing he didn't win, too. Since he couldn't leave her side, what would his girlfriend do had he won?
Breaking the rules from the very beginning of the race, Ossoff didn't live in the very district he wanted to represent. He got away with that infraction by citing as his main reason that thing all Socialists claim is more important than anything:
Caring.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Ossoff cared about his girlfriend to whom he was affianced and she was going to Emory and she just had to live close by the school and he just had to live with her and nobody but nobody was going to stop him from supporting her dreams and goals, no sirree.
Still, Ossoff was gracious in his loss saying, "This is not the outcome any of us were hoping for. But this is the beginning of something much bigger than us."
That quote might sound like a platitude, but it does, in fact, stay within DPS' marching orders: Keep in lockstep as one shouts the party line.
Social media is already lit up with explanations of why he lost. The best one yet? Ossoff's opponent party cheated by having the borders of the district changed to have more of their friends in it.
Rule breakers complaining about breaking rules? Folks, you can't make this stuff up.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
The Slants: Protecting and Defending
Who knew an Asian-American rock band out of Oregon would be leading the fight to protect and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the U.S. But they are. The Slants had their case heard by SCOTUS. They hoped to get a ruling in their favor on federally registered trademarks even if they offend.
They got what they wanted. SCOTUS said the government cannot censor any trademark just because somebody thinks it is offensive or gets offended by it. In fact, here is exactly what was said by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. as he expressed his opinion for the court:
“Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend."
 |
| From Atlanta Journal Constitution |
I applaud their fight.
Go Slants!
Go Redskins!
Now I just wonder when we'll get Chief Noc-A-Homa back to Atlanta after those self-righteous do-gooders ran him out of town and took the fun out of baseball.
After all, we finally ignored those whiners and brought back the chop.
And I bet all those liberals in the crowds at Braves games become free-speech-loving conservatives real quick when their boys are on the mound duking it out with visitors.
How To Drown out Chanting Libs
First: Buy an air horn.
Two: When this happens
Three: Put on ear protectors.
Four: Smile.
Five: Point toward angry crowd.
Six: Push the button
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)