“I am strong. I am invincible. I am woman.”

At it again...all for you.

by Angela K. Durden
The Most Brilliant Woman in the World

Citizen Journalist.  Novelist. Author of other stuff. 

Business writer.  Songwriter.  Protecting creator's copyrights. 

In the opening months of 2019, in the self-identified great state of New York, a bill was passed that took away standing law allowing for criminal charges of murder in the abortion of a child after 24 weeks in utero. 

What that meant was that beginning in January of 2019, any time a child was actually being pushed from a woman’s body or going to be taken out via caesarean section, as long as the child was still in the mother’s body the child could be killed and nobody would get in trouble.

Killing a human is permissible, but killing a bird will get you in trouble?

Yes, according to the aforementioned newly passed law in New York state and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act which reads in part:

“…This law, originally passed in 1940, provides for the protection of the bald eagle and the golden eagle (as amended in 1962) by prohibiting the take, possession, sale, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, of any bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, including any part, nest, or egg, unless allowed by permit Bald Eagle sitting in tree (16 U.S.C. 668(a); 50 CFR 22). ‘Take’ includes…poison, wound, kill…or disturb.…civil penalties for violating…of $5,000 or one year imprisonment with $10,000 or not more than two years in prison for a second conviction. Felony convictions carry a maximum fine of $250,000 or two years of imprisonment. The fine doubles for an organization. Rewards are provided for information leading to arrest and conviction for violation of the Act.”

The author's newborn grandson
holds his father's thumb.

Let's see. Abortion uses poisoning, wounding, disturbing, and killing, but that's okay when used on a human fertilized egg/baby. The New York law smacks of politically correct caring run amuck. Now in the news Virginia is being asked to add the same law to their state. All in the name of Women’s Rights to Self-Determination.

Except even in this females are not created equally. That’s right. No test for gender is carried out to determine if the soon-to-be-aborted baby is female or male.

Even Red China does that and we know how degenerate they are in everything including copyright, theft of intellectual property, faking of mechanical parts and food, and putting all that into the world’s trade pipeline. Granted, Red China only aborts females which has led to a massive amount of men not being able to find a mate and have a child.

Or, to put it another way, growing a massive army ready to be sacrificed for world domination.

Still, one would think in the U.S., the European Union, and the British Isles, somebody would think it prudent to check if the abortion was negatively impacting the rights of the female in the womb. But they do not.

See? Not all females are created equally.

But how to limit the guilt in the killing of a female that these folks claim they care so much about? That is simple. It is a multi-step process. First, show the fertilized egg does not look like a human, but more like an animal and proclaim, “See the thing? It does not look like a baby. So, until it looks like a baby, it isn’t a baby.” Rename it fetus and stop calling it a baby.

Second, begin to claim that if it cannot live outside the womb of its own accord, then it is not really alive. Scientific and technological advances soon made that an almost impossible argument to win as award-winning obstetrical, surgical, and neonatal units with leading-edge care were saving fetuses right and left and documentaries were made that helped raise millions upon millions of dollars in research funding and the press — print, online, radio, and broadcast — highlighted happy parents whose fetuses were saved and grew into a lovely child that has brought nothing but happiness and joy to the world.

Giving up that tactic, abortion proponents next claimed that there are all sorts of genders and that those genders are chosen after birth. See? They aren’t killing a female because that thing in the womb has not yet self-identified as nor claimed any particular gender.

Pretzel logic is what that is. No. I will not insult a pretzel by calling it that. Instead, let me state definitely that such logic is from Satan. Satan was the first to attack a child — God’s child Eve — for selfish motive, so it takes no stretch of the imagination to understand from where come such thinking about the benefits of child murder.

But how can we get a goodly amount of people to believing that what is wrong is right? That’s easy. Just keep hammering away at Women’s Rights and screaming down anyone who dares to question. Change law. Gut the Constitution of the United States. Sue the pants off anybody or any business that does not toe the party line. Begin teaching schoolchildren the fundamentals of evil disguised as caring. Banish freedom of speech. And more.

In the U.S. and other countries, the killing of a child still in the womb is styled as a statement of women's rights. Women brag that their abortions were "wonderful, thank you very much". Others have publicly apologized that they haven't yet had an abortion and have let down all the other women who care so much for women's rights.

The reasons for a real medically necessary abortion are extremely limited and no one has any complaint about those and are well-known to medical personnel. Life and death decisions are hard to make and cause anguish and pain of heart. Let me be blunt when I say it:

Therapeutic abortions, my ass.

 It is wrong to turn into celebration the taking of the life of a person in the womb. Yes, I said wrong. It is evil. It is wicked. It is a crime. It is immoral. And dishonest? Oh, yes. 

It is the height of dishonesty to claim that rape resulting in a child makes it okay to kill the second victim of that crime and yet that same woman will not report the rape because it is just too hard for her to go through? 

You disagree? That is your right. You want to kill your child while in the womb? You go right on ahead and do it and settle up with God later. But do not ask me to pay for you to get it done. Do not ask me to agree with your reasons for it if having the abortion is a choice that supports your agenda or helps free up your schedule for the rest of your life. Adoption will just as easily free it up, too.

Those who scream loudest to be allowed to slaughter their own children with impunity are the first to denounce the slaughter of an animal for food. Abortionists cry out to “Save the innocent kittens! Save the precious puppies! It is immoral to eat eggs! Milking cows without their permission is wrong!”

Abortionists are the first to shriek for the rights of criminals but are willing to kill an innocent. Tells you all you need to know about the safety of your life, family, property, and rights if they are in control.

We are told they are to be honored because their opinion is worth listening to simply because it is their right to speak freely? Hell no. Their insanity is staggering and their psychosis is profound. I will not honor such. And why should I grant them that favor when they do not honor me? See how it works? Goose and gander, what’s good for the one is good for the other. 

But let’s just back up a bit and see just how far Women’s Rights have come. I reference here for you a song written in 1971 by Helen Reddy and Ray Burton of Australia entitled “I Am Woman” which subsequently was a worldwide hit for Helen Reddy as the artist, made Universal Music Group a ton in royalties, and became the anthem for the Women’s Rights Movement. We will dissect the song momentarily.

Verse:

I am woman, hear me roar

In numbers too big to ignore

And I know too much to go back an' pretend.

’Cause I've heard it all before

And I've been down there on the floor

No one's ever gonna keep me down again.

Chorus:

Oh yes, I am wise, but it's wisdom born of pain.

Yes, I've paid the price, but look how much I gained.

If I have to, I can do anything.

I am strong. I am invincible. I am woman.

Verse:

You can bend but never break me

’Cause it only serves to make me

More determined to achieve my final goal.

And I come back even stronger

Not a novice any longer

’Cause you've deepened the conviction in my soul.

Chorus

Verse:

I am woman, watch me grow.

See me standing toe to toe.

As I spread my lovin' arms across the land.

But I'm still an embryo

With a long, long way to go

Until I make my brother understand.

Chorus

Please go back and take a look at what I’ve highlighted in bold italics.

The Women’s Rights Movement has done nothing but disempower females, urging them to be so weak that they cannot even carry a child to full term and give it up for adoption because their emotional response to giving up that living child to adults who would give the child a home and love is just too, too, too, too much for them to handle. Oh, the pain of knowing that one day that child might come looking for its biological parents is just too, too, too, too much to have to bear. Oh, the pain.

Notice that songwriters Helen and Ray use the word embryo to describe women who have not yet become fully formed in their power, wisdom, and understanding? The logic of abortionists says that a fully formed child is not deserving of protection and help unless it can breathe on its own. Therefore, carrying that to its reasonable conclusion, women who are weak, foolish, and ignorant/stupid should not be afforded the help or support to become wise, powerful, and knowledgeable.

See how their logic breaks down?

“I am strong. I am invincible. I am woman!” is fun to sing but is pure fantasy pushed by those who live in a black and white world that must conform to their ideal of what that phrase means. The Women’s Rights Movement does not roar.

It shrieks like a banshee.
It whines like a wussy.
It stamps its feet like a petulant child.
It degrades all it touches.
It avoids responsibility.
It devalues truth.
It tells lies.
It denounces spirituality that involves a loving Almighty God who self-identifies as Father.
It destroys families.
It preaches hate for all males.
It hates women.
It supports weakness.
It revels in death.
It rejoices in destruction.

It is something to be avoided.
It is something to be fought against.

SUPPORT YOUR CITIZEN JOURNALIST.

VISIT Consolidated Author Page

AND BUY A BOOK!