The term “October
surprise” is an evergreen in politics, but it seems dated this time around.
Nobody will be surprised at whatever the Democrats and their operatives in the
media throw at Donald Trump. On the flip side, Trump forces will slime Hillary
Clinton, with almost every media outlet quick to ignore dirt or defend her.
The latest
hysterical anti-Trump salvo comes from the Gray Lady (a/k/a The New York
Times), which got an anonymous gift in the mail – selected pages from Trump’s
1995 state tax returns from New Jersey, New York and Connecticut. They reported
carry-forward losses of $916 million.
The Times
consulted with “tax experts” and determined that such a massive loss stuffed
into a single year “could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal
income taxes for up to 18 years.” Those trying to pass this off as a scandal
hope you read over the word “legally.” They also hope you don’t notice that
Clinton and the Times’ parent company itself have used the same section of the
tax code.
Indeed, this
doesn’t even seem like news when Trump’s 1997 book, “The Art of the Comeback,”
is examined. Early in it, he talked of having a negative net worth of $900
million. The New York media gleefully speculated about Trump’s financial
problems through the early 1990s, and this new evidence seems to confirm those
stories.
But could there
be more to this affair than meets the eye? The return address on the envelope
send to the Times was “Trump Tower.” Likely a joke, but consider this: If Trump
had released his old tax returns – say, starting in 1995 -- the carry-forward
loss would have been conveniently ignored by media eager to scream that “Trump
paid no taxes for X years, while you did.” This leak all but assures that if
future returns reach the public eye, the carry-forward angle will have been
well explored.
There is also a
chance the story could take a different turn. As The Wall Street Journal
editorial board notes: “Trump
has driven his political opponents to embrace the cause of tax reform so the
wealthy have fewer loopholes to exploit. That seems to be the inescapable logic
of the media and Clinton campaign’s reaction …”
Inescapable
logic, they say. The next time the left even recognizes logic will be the
first.
No comments:
Post a Comment